Is the SWP used to attack Galloway?

That’s what Splintered Sunrise thinks, because since the split in Respect the SWP side of the story has gotten a much more sympathetic airing in the media than the Galloway side:

George Galloway, on the other hand, is quite a different kettle of fish. I have my own serious reservations about George, but there’s no gainsaying the fact that the media are out to get George, and for reasons that have nothing to do with my reservations. Indeed, they’re after him for his good points. Let’s be honest, George, whether we like it or not, is just about the most recognisable face of the antiwar movement. He’s one of the most articulate critics of New Labour. He has that extremely important connection with the working-class Asian population in the East End. Lord help us, he’s a serious asset to our side as well as being an incorrigible loose cannon.

All this should be fairly obvious. If the SWP side in the split is getting puff jobs in the media, not to mention acquiring the critical support of Harry’s Place and the Alliance for Workers Liberty, that’s not an accident. These guys have a clear sense of priorities. There are of course other factors – Private Eye’s repeated snarky references to the Asian element of Respect gel with the sort of casual racism one expects from the Eye – but in the end it comes down to priorities. Using the SWP as a cat’s paw against Galloway is using a sprat to catch a whale.

The point here is not who was at fault in the acrinomious split of Respect last year, but whether the SWP is letting itself used to attack a former ally who they might now have issues with, but who is still far preferable to the people trying to bring him down, still nominally socialist. This split has not been easy to either of the parties involved, so I can understand the temptation to lash out, but it’s a good rule of thumb for any socialist not to give your real opponents ammunition to bring down fellow leftists. Not that the SWP is the only one to have given in to this temptation, as a casual perusal of Socialist Unity shows. there are plenty of people on the left who hate the SWP as well and they have not always been discreet. Of course, that doesn’t mean you should never speak ill of fellow lefties, genuine political differences or real cases of abuse should not be hidden, but the sort of gloating you sometimes find about the SWP’s (or other organisations) troubles isn’t helpful.

Oona King uses pensioner in smear campaign against Respect

Oona King shamefully using an attacked pensioner to smear Respect

Over at the pro-war left’s hiding holes the usual suspects have been lapping up a story about an alleged attack on a pensioner by Respect supporters leafletting for George Galloway. Unfortunately for them, this story seems to have been made up out of whole cloth by Oona King’s campaign team or some other interested party, as none of the details of the attack ring true.


The claim
:

Mr Les Dobrovolski, 69, was approached by a group of young men handing out George Galloway’s Respect/ SWP literature, last Thursday 21 April, near Spitalfield Market in East London.

After refusing to take a leaflet and telling the men he would never vote for George Galloway, Mr
Dobrovolski says he was followed by one of the men and pushed to the floor. The man then stamped on his hand before dropping a Respect leaflet on him and running off.

Mr Dobrovolski was taken by ambulance to the local hospital where he was x-rayed and given stitches.
He is scheduled to return to hospital next week for surgery to straighten his broken nose. The police
were informed of the attack and are currently investigating.

Now the facts, courtesy of Lenin’s Tomb

On Thursday 21st April, Les Dobrovolski told the police that he had been attacked, but there was no
mention of him having been assaulted by Respect supporters or of any leaflet. The first time such a
claim appeared anywhere was in the Labour Party’s press-release. The police have confirmed, categorically, that no such claims were made to the police when Mr Dobrovolski was interviewed, and that they are not investigating the Respect party in connection with this. They issued it as a general statement to the press, which is why most papers did not touch it.

The claim that Mr Dobrovolski encountered Respect supporters canvassing for George Galloway in Poplar is highly improbable, to say the least, since Poplar is not in the constituency being contested by
George Galloway. There were no canvassers out there. The leaflet that was allegedly dropped on Mr
Dobrovolski following the attack was still in the printers on the day of the attack, and was sent out
as a postal drop – ie, sent by the printers directly to Royal Mail, and not to Respect leaders or
canvassers. The earliest the leaflet could have been sent out was on Saturday’s post.

Do keep in mind Oona King already had to settle out of court once for a libel action George Galloway brought against her, only to repeat the libel almost immediately afterwards. Since the start of campaigning she has been trying to make the race as nasty as possible, constantly smearing Respect and Galloway; this fits in perfectly.

The smear itself is bad enough, but to use a bystander, a pensioner in a dirty war against Respect is
quite something else.