Of course ATOS sponsors the Paralympics

So ATOS is the mercenary company that does the UK government’s dirty work, throwing disabled people off welfare, telling cancer patients on chemo that they’re fit to work, killing some 32 people a week according to some estimates. It’s also the company that sponsors the London Paralympics, which understandably got a lot of people outraged. Here we have the event that celebrates disabled people overcoming their handicaps, yadda yadda and it’s paid for by the profits of the company that does its best to kill them off? That’s bound to tick any right thinking person off.

But to be honest, it makes perfect sense. The paralympics celebrates the good disabled, the ones that inspire us and make us feel good that they may be in a wheelchair but didn’t let that stop them becoming world class athletes. Those parasitic dole scum on the other hand, who have been holding up their hand to decent hardworking tax payers, those are the evil disabled, the people struggling to live their daily lives we’d rather not see, not fit and good looking or having a photogenic handicap. The Paralympics is the other side of the coin of that media portrayal of disabled people as benefit scum unwilling to work.

On the one hand we hear day in, day out about benefit cheats, we live in a media climate in which every disabled person is a cheat and treated as such, then every four years there’s a feel good media circus where we see that if they have enough will power, disabled people can do anything. What’s missing is seeing disabled people leading day to day lives: it’s either the one percent of incredibly lucky, incredibly fit top athletes, or the much much smaller group of pretend cripples. Yet most people, temporarily able or not, are neither top athletes nor fraudsters.

It’s easy to other disabled people; has anybody ever been jealous of a guy in a wheelchair, even a gold medalist in a wheelchair? If we’re healthy and able (for the moment), we tend to just ignore or exclude those who aren’t, despite the very real possibility that we ourselves will join at some point in our lives. We want to keep our ideas about disabilities simple and clean, put every disabled person in a box labeled hero, villain or victim, rather than deal with the messy reality where the guy in the wheelchair is just another bloke.

Trains to Brazil



Best song the Guillemots ever did; pretty good for a largely annoying hipster band, as it captured the mood of the UK after 7/7 and the shooting of Jean Charles de Menezes. At the time I was working at a small startup where I could listen to 6usic all day and this came up loads of times in late 2005/early 2006. That was also around the time Sandra and I bought our house and before her health problems had gotten the worst of her. In retrospect one of the happier times of our lives and this fits that so well: uplifting melody, bitter sweet lyrics, a simple recipe deftly executed.

Dutch rightwing politician thinks rape won’t make you pregnant

In a bid to show that Dutch (rightwing) politicians can be just as thick as their American counterparts, the leader of the SGP (the explicitly rightwing Christian party) argued that rape won’t make you pregnant:

‘Women seldom get pregnant as a result of rape and that is a fact,’ orthodox Christian party SGP leader Kees van der Staaij told a tv programme on Tuesday.

He was reacting to a question about the furore in the US around similar remarks made by Republican congressman Todd Akin.

Van der Staaij said rape is dreadful and recognises the huge consequences for the victims, but his party remains against abortion. ‘We are, under all circumstances, for the unborn life,’ he told the RTL programme.

The SGP has long been ignored and tolerated by Dutch politics as a whole, a principled party that stood for a largely neglected part of the Dutch population, the socalled bible belt. Their views may be old fashioned, even reactionary, but who cares, they’ll never get into government anyway. Which meant that for decades they’ve been able to e.g. get away with not giving women voting rights within the party, while recently, due to the minority rightwing government, it has had an undue influence on government policy in return for its support. So far this has luckily been minimal, but the mere fact that van der Staaij felt comfortable to utter these statements on public television shows the growing confidence of the party.

Norman London — William Fitz Stephen

Cover of Norman London


Norman London
William Fitz Stephen
109 pages including index
published in 1990

Now here’s an interesting little booklet. The meat of it consists on a treatise on Norman London, originally written by one William Fitz Stephen for his Life of Thomas Beckett, sometime before 1183. It’s therefore as close an eyewitness account of Norman London as we could ever get. Though interesting, this in itself is not enough to make a book of course. It is therefore partnered by another, more modern essay on the city, written in 1934 by Frank M. Stenton, a renowned historian of Anglo-Saxon England. These two pieces combined from the basis for what’s perhaps the most useful feature of the book, the maps of Norman London at the back of it.

There’s not really much more to say about Norman London. It’s an informative little booklet, but nothing more than that. What’s more, as the Stenton essay is more than seventy years old, it can’t help but be outdated, as new insights, more archaeological research and new theories will have altered our views of the period. I don’t think this would give a good picture of what we thought the Norman city looked like anymore. But this doesn’t make it worthless, if only because it still includes that eyewitness account of London, one of the few if not the only one we have of London at that particular point in time. The Stenton essay on the other hand is more of interest now for its own inherent historical value than for its accuracy.

Read more