Seventy years after Cable Street: nothing changes



It’s seventy years ago that the Battle of Cable Street against Mosley’s fascists was fought and won by a broad coalition of Jews, trade unionists, Labour Party members, Communists and residents. It showed that anti-fascists forces could win these battles, despite police interference, despite unwillingness on the part of the then Communist Party leadership to commit themselves to the battle. Ordinary people could defeat fascists as long as they were united against it. Even though, as this this eyewitness report shows, the police was largely on the fascists side and was busy protecting their march.

That’s the other lesson of Cable Street of course, that the police is far more willing to use violence to protect fascist’ demonstrations against leftwingers than it is to do the opposite. You still see this whenever the modern equivalent of Mosley’s fascists march like recently in Amsterdam, when under the guise of an anti-pedophile march skinheads marched through Amsterdam-zuid, a neighbourhood with a large Jewish presence…

Of course you can have some sympathy for the view that in a democracy any group, no matter how odious their views, should be allowed to air them, as long as they stay within the law while doing so. But even when they don’t stay within the law, the police has a remarkable reluctance to take the fascists on, as the case of Redwatch shows:

Alec McFadden was dozing in his armchair when a loud bang on his front door brought him to his senses with a jolt. Looking out of the window of his Wallasey home, he saw a young man half slumped in the driveway. “I couldn’t see his face but he looked like he was in some sort of trouble, like he needed help,” says McFadden. “I opened the door just a bit to ask if he was OK and he threw himself at me and started hitting me around the head.”

What McFadden did not realise at the time was that he was not being punched but stabbed. “I think it went on for a couple of minutes before I managed to get the door closed. I turned round and my daughter was screaming. It was only then, as I put my hand to my face and felt the blood, that I realised what had happened.”

The attack, which left the long-time union activist with serious injuries, was the latest and most violent incident in a campaign of intimidation that has been waged against opponents of the far right in the UK over the past five years. Like hundreds of people who have spoken out against the rise of the British National Party and other extremist groups, McFadden’s picture and home address have been collected by far right activists and posted on a website called Redwatch.

The site, which has links with the neo-Nazi organisation Combat 18 and a host of European fascist organisations, is hosted in the US but registered and run from the UK. It lists the personal details and shows the photographs of anti-racists – many taken during protests against the British National Party – alongside the slogan: “Remember places, traitors’ faces, they’ll all pay for their crimes.” This month a delegation of MPs and union activists will visit the Home Office to call for the site to be closed down. It is a familiar refrain and in the past officials have argued that because the site is hosted abroad, there is nothing they can do. However, Redwatch’s sister site in Poland, which was also hosted in the US, was recently closed down after collaboration between authorities in the the two countries, and Home Office minister Vernon Coaker has agreed to champion the campaign within government.

So seventy years after the police attempted to let Mosley march through the Jewish area of Cable Street, the Home Office protects the right of Mosley’s spiritual heirs to intimidate and attack leftwingers and antifascists.

Joe Sacco on US torture in Iraq

page from Joe Sacco's strip on the testimony of Iraqi victims of US torture


If you don’t know Joe Sacco’s work, you have missed some of the best and most politically engaged comix of the past twenty years. He started out as yet another autobiographer, a Crumb-lite, but then he got distracted by the first Gulf War. Since then he has pioneered his own brand of comics journalism, going to Palestine and Bosnia, talking to people, getting their stories on paper.

His latest piece, of which the above page is an extract, is available as a 3.3 Mb PDF file from The Guardian website. Sacco talked to two victims of US torture, when they came to the US recently to bring suit against Donald Rumsfeld for their torture. Sacco manages to capture their experiences in a way no photographs could ever do.

Save us from useless political stunts

Useless political stunts like this reshelving George Orwell’s 1984 from fiction into current affairs. My sides split from unrefrained joy at that prospect. That’ll tell Bush we’re serious.

Yes it looks like a harmless, even charming stunt, but. The one thing to ask with any form of protest is, what does it accomplish? This accomplishes nothing, other than making the participants feel good. It’s replacement activity, sucking up energy that could’ve been put into fighting Bush and worse it’s replacement activity that makes you look stupid. Its the sort of granola eating birkenstock wearing treehugging hippie crap that a Republican operative would like you to do. It changes nothing and it’s meant to change nothing. Politics as a hipster game.

In other words, I completely agree with Chris from Qwghlm:

I’m sorry – this guy has been in charge of your country for, what, over four and a half years? In that time, he’s exploited a terrorist atrocity in order to start an illegal war, destroyed your country’s credibility in the international community, passed draconian laws, imprisoned people without trial, privatised your social security system, given enormous tax breaks to the already obscenely wealthy, run up a massive national debt, done nothing in response to global warming and… this is the best you can come up with? For fuck’s sake, how does pissing off a few hard-working bookstore employees, who will inevitably have to spend time undoing your pathetic sub-Mark Thomas jape, equate in your minds to making a political statement? But then you’ve probably never had to do a crap job in your lives, you hipster douchebags, so you wouldn’t actually know what a pain in the arse you actually are. Why not actually try working for once, instead of being a smug, lazy showoff prick? While you’re at it, why not actually broaden your horizons, gain some sophistication, and find out about books other than Nineteen Eighty-Four, because quite frankly, referring to it all the damn time and trying to use it as an allegory for whatever you want to whine about is the height of intellectual laziness, and something that is probably making Orwell somersault in his grave as I type. In summary then, you are a grade-A fuckwit, who’s more concerned with trying to gain kudos for being a “subversive” amongst your braying sub-Nathan Barley peers by making this “statement”, when actually you have less sophistication than a cunt rolling downhill in a shopping trolley. It’s wankers like you who deserve to have the government you have at the moment, and if I could have it my way, you’d have Bush for a third term, all the fucking way to 2012 – maybe by then you’ll realise that there’s more to political action than merely going ‘Barnes & Noble! Pwn3d!’. Now, do the whole world a favour, and fuck off.”

Justice is served?

From 1976 to 1983 Argentina was ruled by a military junta, which waged a dirty war against their own subjects. During that time tens of thousands of people were disappeared: arrested, tortured and killed. In 1986/87, several years after the fall of the junta in 1983 (partially caused by their ill fated attempt to conquer the Falklands Islands) two laws were passed giving immunity to those responsible for the Dirty War and those who participated in it. Not only did these get immunity in Argentine courts, but also from extradition requests from foreign governments.

Fortunately, this does not mean that these torturers and murderers can walk the streets freely, as this Washington Post article shows:

Women have spit on him. Men have chased him with crowbars. While he was waiting for a bus a few years ago in the Patagonian city of Bariloche, Argentine media described in a well-known case, a man walked calmly up to him and in a conversational tone asked:

“Are you Astiz?”

“Yes I am,” Astiz answered.

The man punched him twice in his face and kicked him in his groin before Astiz ran away. Every year since, on the anniversary of the assault, the townspeople hold a block party in the exact spot where the punches were thrown, to celebrate humiliation of Astiz.

I’m not one to argues in favour of mob violence, but here you have not a situation where people take the law into their own hands even though there is a functioning justice system present, but because these people are unpunishable by it, are above the law. In such a situation I find taking the law into your own hands to be commendable. These people need to be punished one way or another, not to escape scott free.

(Meanwhile, the Dutch crown prince saw nothing wrong with marrying the daughter of one of Argentine’s leaders during the dirty war. But hey, it’s alright, he said he hadn’t know what happened then and he wasn’t invited to the wedding anway, the poor guy.)