Two PVV members leave because of lack of democracy

There’s a surprise.

But it couldn’t happen to a nicer guy. At the end of the press conference launching his election programme, two members of his parliamentary faction announced their split from the party. According to them Wilders was authoritarian, egocentric and had lost all touch with “Henk and Ingrid”, the common Dutch folk.

Something that could’ve only been news to the PVV faithful.

Wilders’ party isn’t actually a real party after all, with memberships and internal democracy, but a vereniging, a voluntary association, with Geert Wilders as its only member; to be recognised as a political party it has to have at least two founders and one member. In the PVV’s case the member is Wilders and the founders are Wilders and the “Stichting Groep Wilders”, which he of course also owns. You can therefore volunteer for the PVV or support them financially, but nobody but Wilders has any say in the political course of the party, not even its members of parliament. Of course, in practise these will have some say in party policy, but the limits are entirely set by Wilders.

But what would you expect from an authoritarian, xenophobic politician with a flair for right wing populism? Consensus based policies?

Dutch Pirate Party does well in the polls

Dutch election poll results 24-06-2012

You may have missed it, but Holland is slowly but surely being gripped by election fever as election night creeps closer. It’s still a while away though, as they’re being held on 12 September. Yet the electioneering battle has already started, still low key, as the various parties position themselves. The mainstream parties (social-democrat PvdA, Christan Democrat CDA, right-liberal VVD, and for now, the xenophobic PVV of Geert Wilders) are not doing well for the moment, with the last three of course hindered by their involvement in the current, disastrous government, while the PvdA still hasn’t learned to meaningfully oppose. Instead, as you can see the voters have polarised, with the echt-socialist SP winning big, while the centrist-liberal D66 also profiting; they always do if they haven’t been in government for a while, only to lose again once in office.

But the biggest news is hidden under the heading “Overige partijen” — “other parties: the Dutch branch of the Pirate Party would’ve been elected to parliament with one seat had elections been held today! That’s quite impressive for an internet only (so far) party with very little name recognition so far. It’s also a sign of health for our democracy if they do manage to get a seat in parliament; even better if they get a couple more, as they themselves are hoping.

The Dutch political system is one that naturally drives parties to the centre, as no party is ever capable of securing a majority in parliament on its own. This leads to periods of bland conformity as the rightwing parties get a little more leftist and the leftwing parties get a lot more rightwing; the nineties were like that, when VVD, D66 and PvdA outmanoeuvred the CDA to rule for most of the decade. For every action there’s a reaction and that gets you periods of greater polarisation as well as the rise of new parties. D66 got its start as the first of them, wanting to break open the cozy relationships between the old parties, but has long since been captured by the system; various other parties didn’t last long or became “confessional”, splinter parties you voted for to be ideologically pure but with no real hope of ever winning power.

Lately of course, with the near-simultaneous rise of the SP from small leftwing to largest leftwing opposition party and the xenophobic and populist movements of first Pim Fortuyn, then Geert Wilders polarisation has come back with a vengeance. This in turn naturally offers changes for new parties that deliberately refuse to place themselves on the old left-righ axis: the Partij voor de Dieren, the animal rights party managed this during the last elections, might the Piratenpartij follow them during this one? I hope so, because the system needs new blood and ideas.

Net Neutrality enacted in Holland

Some good news from the Netherlands for a change:

On 8 May 2012 The Netherlands adopted crucial legislation to safeguard an open and secure internet in The Netherlands. It is the first country in Europe to implement net neutrality in the law. In addition, it adopted provisions protecting users against disconnection and wiretapping by providers. Digital rights movement Bits of Freedom calls upon other countries to follow the Dutch example.

[…]

In addition, the law includes an anti-wiretapping provision, restricting internetproviders from using invasive wiretapping technologies, such as deep packet inspection (DPI). They may only do so under limited circumstances, or with explicit consent of the user, which the user may withdraw at any time. The use of DPI gained much attention when KPN admitted that it analysed the traffic of its users to gather information on the use of certain apps. The law allows for wiretapping with a warrant.

Moreover, the law includes a provision ensuring that internet providers can only disconnect their users in a very limited set of circumstances. Internet access is very important for functioning in an information society, and providers currently could on the basis of their terms and conditions disconnect their users for numerous reasons. The provision allows for the disconnection in the case of fraud or when a user doesn’t pay his bills.

There are some specific Dutch clauses to the bill. The bill prohibits filtering of internet all together, providers cannot block any website or service whatsoever, no more blocking of Skype or Youtube on mobile phones just because it costs the providers money. But what it does allow is belief based filtering: there are a few providers who provide internet connections for e.g. Christians who’d rather not be confronted with the wicked outside and those are still legal. Which is as it should be.

The important thing is that no provider is now able to block services or websites they don’t like.

Pim Fortuyn: ten years after

the body of Fortuyn after he was murdered

Ten years ago Pim Fortuyn was killed by an animal rights activist who wanted to save Dutch Muslims from prosecution at his hands. Ironically a study earlier this week showed that six in ten high school students actually think that he was murdered by a Muslim…

Which was actually my greatest fear when I heard the news of his murder back then, before we knew the murderer had been arrested and turned out to be a white Dutch man. Had the murderer be a Muslim, the anger and fear many people felt in the wake of the murder might have been transformed into something very nasty; already there had been people setting fire to the parking lot inside the parliamentary grounds. Who knows what could’ve happened.

Reality was bad enough anyway. Dutch politics were already shifting rightward anyway, of which Fortuyn’s rise was one symptom, but with his death the dam burst. We got a media climate in which Islamophobia was no longer a taboo and and a long line of politicians exploiting this, with Geert Wilders as the end result. We’ve become much more open about our racism, with opinions that would’ve been anathema fifteen years ago now openly discussed in the media. What Fortuyn and Wilders have been saying about Islam and “non-western immigrants” this decade was also said by Hans Janmaat in the eighties, but he was treated as a pariah for them, not feted.

Fortuyn’s murder was therefore counterproductive to what his murderer tried to achieve: instead of abating Islamphobia, it encouraged it. Had Fortuyn lived it might’ve never become as prevelant as it has been this last decade.

The end of the wietpas?

One advantage of the collapse of the Dutch government is that the socalled wietpas might just be scrapped, at least nationally. Tomorrow it will be rolled out in the southern provinces, which means foreign socalled drugs tourists will no longer be able to buy dope in a coffee shop in Maastricht or any other southern city. Next year it was supposed to be put in force nation wide, but this still has to be confirmed by parliament and might just be declared “controversial” now that the government has lost its mandate. Which means that it can’t be treated in parliament until after the elections, scheduled for the 12th of September and who knows what will happen after them.

The whole wietpas legislation has been driven by drugs warriors in the CDA and the VVD, though to a somewhat lesser extent there; it’s far from a given that these two parties will return to power, while other parties are less than interested in this subject. If the wietpas quietly disappears into the dustbin of history this will be very good for Amsterdam, as some twentyfive percent of tourists come here especially for the dope…

It still leaves the southern border provinces with it, but I suspect that it will die a quiet death there too if it’s never put into law nationally.