Antifascists are the real terrorists!

With local elections to be held early next month, the AIVD, the Dutch security and intelligence service warns about an insidious new threat in the runup to these elections: the threat of antifascist demonstrations (Dutch). In a letter sent to all mayors in the Netherlands, the AIVD describes the sinister group responsible for this threat: AFA, Anti Fascistisch Actie and its methods. It makes for chilling reason the way this group is in the habit of contacting local governments to advice them on racism, organises counterdemonstrations against nazi intimidation and even organises within local communities to defend against racist aggression! Worse, they even deliberately cause the racists and fascists they organise against to attack them and beat them up.

Ironically, the AIVD even accuses AFA from infiltrating rightwing groups in order to gather intelligence on them — something the intelligence services have never done themselves, at least succesfully.

This piece of fearmongering, silly at it is, does show the mindset of those supposedly guarding us. Rightwing, racist and even fascist intimidation is not a problem, but attempts to defend against it are beyond the pale. This is of course neither new nor surprising, considering the rightwing sympathies of most intelligence services. As long as rightwing violence doesn’t threaten the state directly it’s tolerated, even encouraged, while leftwing activism is always a threat, no matter how legitimite or innocent, even in supposedly democratic states. What is new is how blatant this warning was, something we have not seen in a while. A more paranoid person might wonder about possible connections between this, the economic situation and the way this is used as an excuse for the drastic budget cuts the government wants to force through parliament…

You got to be fucking kidding me

BBC to vet BNP Question Time audience for anti-fascists but not fascists? Seem so:

Audience members for the Question Time edition featuring BNP chief Nick Griffin are being rigorously’ vetted by BBC producers to weed out likely anti-fascist demonstrators, it was confirmed today.

BBC bosses fear protesters could disrupt the recording of the programme, due to take place at the Wood Lane studios on 22 October.

As well as filling out the normal detailed questionnaire, applicants to become audience members will also be checked for membership or involvement in organisations such as United Against Facism. Many are likely to be questioned personally and be asked to prove their identities on the door.

United Against Facism, which is planning a mass blockade of the BBC studios on the day, has also urged its supporters to apply to join the audience, putting a link on its website to the audience application form.

The Corporation has confirmed that it is working closely with the Metropolitan Police and Hammersmith and Fulham council to keep a lid on the protests.

The council is concerned at the potential for disruption to local people and has asked the BBC to pay for extra policing, which the Corporation has rejected.

Heaven knows we can’t have any disturbances when the fash Nick Griffin is spouting his filth. Nice to see the Met getting involved as well; they know how to deal with peaceful protests, as proven earlier this year.

An open letter from the SWP

In this crisis and with the BNP victorious the left must unite says the SWP:

An open letter to the left from the Socialist Workers Party (SWP)

Labour’s vote collapsed to a historic low in last week’s elections as the right made gains. The Tories under David Cameron are now set to win the next general election.

The British National Party (BNP) secured two seats in the European parliament. Never before have fascists achieved such a success in Britain.

The result has sent a shockwave across the labour and anti-fascist movements, and the left.

The meltdown of the Labour vote and the civil war engulfing the party poses a question – where do we go from here?

The fascists pose a threat to working class organisations, black, Asian and other residents of this country – who BNP führer Nick Griffin dubs “alien” – our civil liberties and much else.

History teaches us that fascism can be fought and stopped, but only if we unite to resist it.

The SWP firmly believes that the first priority is to build even greater unity and resistance to the fascists over the coming months and years.

The BNP believes it has created the momentum for it to achieve a breakthrough. We have to break its momentum.

The success of the anti-Nazi festival in Stoke and the numbers of people who joined in anti-fascist campaigning shows the basis is there for a powerful movement against the Nazis.

The Nazis’ success will encourage those within the BNP urging a “return to the streets”.

This would mean marches targeting multiracial areas and increased racist attacks. We need to be ready to mobilise to stop that occurring.

Griffin predicted a “perfect storm” would secure the BNP’s success. The first part of that storm he identified was the impact of the recession.

The BNP’s policies of scapegoating migrants, black and Asian people will divide working people and make it easier to drive through sackings, and attacks on services and pensions.

Unity is not a luxury. It is a necessity. If we do not stand together we will pay the price for a crisis we did not cause.

The second lesson from the European elections is that we need a united fightback to save jobs and services.

If Cameron is elected he will attempt to drive through policies of austerity at the expense of the vast majority of the British people.

But the Tories’ vote fell last week and they are nervous about pushing through attacks.

Shadow chancellor George Osborne told business leaders, “After three months in power we will be the most unpopular government since the war.”

We need to prepare for battle.

But there is a third and vital issue facing the left and the wider working class. The crisis that has engulfed Westminster benefited the BNP.

The revelations of corruption, which cabinet members were involved in, were too much for many Labour voters, who could not bring themselves to vote for the party.

One answer to the problem is to say that we should swallow everything New Labour has done and back it to keep David Cameron, and the BNP, out.

Yet it would take a miracle for Gordon Brown to be elected back into Downing Street.

The danger is that by simply clinging on we would be pulled down with the wreckage of New Labour.

Mark Serwotka, the general secretary of the PCS civil service workers’ union, has asked how, come the general election, can we ask working people to cast a ballot for ministers like Pat McFadden.

McFadden is pushing through the privatisation of the post office.

Serwotka proposes that trade unions should stand candidates.

Those who campaigned against the BNP in the elections know that when they said to people, “Don’t vote Nazi” they were often then asked who people should vote for.

The fact that there is no single, united left alternative to Labour means there was no clear answer available.

The European election results demonstrate that the left of Labour vote was small, fragmented and dispersed.

The Greens did not make significant gains either. The mass of Labour voters simply did not vote. We cannot afford a repeat of that.

The SWP is all too aware of the differences and difficulties involved in constructing such an alternative.

We do not believe we have all the answers or a perfect prescription for a left wing alternative.

But we do believe we have to urgently start a debate and begin planning to come together to offer such an alternative at the next election, with the awareness that Gordon Brown might not survive his full term.

One simple step would be to convene a conference of all those committed to presenting candidates representing working class interests at the next election.

The SWP is prepared to help initiate such a gathering and to commit its forces to such a project.

We look forward to your response.

But with the examples of the Respect party and Socialist Alliance fresh in their memory, will the rest of the socialist left trust the SWP not sabotage any new regrouping again? Deservedly or not the party does have a reputation of using coalitions only for their own ends, ending them when they no longer seem to gain from them or they might lose control of it. The party needs to show that they’re serious about this open letter before anybody else will want to work with them on anything but a case by case basis.

How the Greens got Nick Griffin elected

Or, the failure of tactical voting. As one disgruntled Socialist Party member and campaigner for the No2EU coalition writes:

I don’t begrudge the Greens their success; two MEPs, a net increase of zero over the last time while the Labour Party is shedding seats the way a yak on vacation in Bali sheds fur, is respectable; but a lot of their increase in voter share was because the Greens were selling very hard this idea of “vote for the Greens, even if you disagree with them, to keep Nick Griffin out”.

So, a bunch of people on the Left did just that.

And Nick Griffin is currently picking out curtains for a Brussels flat.

[…]

So if I am on the Left but I’m not a Green — for whatever reason, and the possible reasons are myriad — and I’ve just held my nose and voted Green on the promise that it was a necessary step in order to keep out the fascists, and I’m sitting hear reading these electoral results…well, I couldn’t help but feel that maybe I’ve just been had.

Recieved opinion has it that it’s so important to keep out the fascists that leftists should hold their nose and vote for parties or candidates they wouldn’t otherwise. The most famous example perhaps being the campaign to keep David Duke from becoming governor of Louisiana. His opponent had long been accused of corruption so the anti-Duke campaign’s (unofficial) slogan was “Vote for the Crook. It’s Important”. Duke lost, but Louisiana still ended up with a crook for governor…

In the EU elections it was the Greens who, as Edmund writes, campaigned on an anti-BNP platform and which was supported by the Respect party. They failed and and if, like Andy Newman, you can blame the No2EU campaign for this as they “stole” votes from the Greens, why can’t you blame the Greens from taking votes from No2EU?

As the election results make clear, the BNP did not win that much more votes this time then they did in 2004; it’s the collapsing Labour vote which helped the BNP win their two seats. Their voting totals went slightly up while over two million less people voted in total than did in 2004. So while the anti-BNP campaign was focused on getting people already voting to vote Green, it would’ve done better to persuade more people to vote in the first place. The economic crisis, the corruption in parliament and the lack of a credible alternative on the left meant people stayed home because voting was pointless.

Tactical voting campaigns don’t work and this is the best proof of it. Election after election the radical left mounts another campaign to either persuade voters not to go for the BNP or to get them to vote for some party supposedly best placed to stop the BNP. The effect of these campaigns is marginal; in this case non-existent. What’s desperately needed is something to vote for. Voters turn away from Labour in droves while finding the two mainstream alternatives, Tories and Lib Dems just as unappealing. Few but out and out racists want to vote BNP but on the left there still isn’t a credible alternative for Labour. The Greens are decent but like the Lib Dems too centrist, while the various socialist splinters barely register on most voters’ radars. One hopeful sign is the surprisingly strong showing of the Socialist Labour Party, which barely campaigned but still managed to get some 173,000 votes.

What’s needed is a realisation that there are no magic bullet, for English socialists to stop chasing the shortcut to a replacement for Labour, be it Socialist Alliance, Respect or No2EU. The only way socialists can make headway and stop the BNP is to go for the hard slog and build the party from the ground up, to not just campaign against the BNP but to grab the moment and offer a true socialist alternative.

Seventy years after Cable Street: nothing changes



It’s seventy years ago that the Battle of Cable Street against Mosley’s fascists was fought and won by a broad coalition of Jews, trade unionists, Labour Party members, Communists and residents. It showed that anti-fascists forces could win these battles, despite police interference, despite unwillingness on the part of the then Communist Party leadership to commit themselves to the battle. Ordinary people could defeat fascists as long as they were united against it. Even though, as this this eyewitness report shows, the police was largely on the fascists side and was busy protecting their march.

That’s the other lesson of Cable Street of course, that the police is far more willing to use violence to protect fascist’ demonstrations against leftwingers than it is to do the opposite. You still see this whenever the modern equivalent of Mosley’s fascists march like recently in Amsterdam, when under the guise of an anti-pedophile march skinheads marched through Amsterdam-zuid, a neighbourhood with a large Jewish presence…

Of course you can have some sympathy for the view that in a democracy any group, no matter how odious their views, should be allowed to air them, as long as they stay within the law while doing so. But even when they don’t stay within the law, the police has a remarkable reluctance to take the fascists on, as the case of Redwatch shows:

Alec McFadden was dozing in his armchair when a loud bang on his front door brought him to his senses with a jolt. Looking out of the window of his Wallasey home, he saw a young man half slumped in the driveway. “I couldn’t see his face but he looked like he was in some sort of trouble, like he needed help,” says McFadden. “I opened the door just a bit to ask if he was OK and he threw himself at me and started hitting me around the head.”

What McFadden did not realise at the time was that he was not being punched but stabbed. “I think it went on for a couple of minutes before I managed to get the door closed. I turned round and my daughter was screaming. It was only then, as I put my hand to my face and felt the blood, that I realised what had happened.”

The attack, which left the long-time union activist with serious injuries, was the latest and most violent incident in a campaign of intimidation that has been waged against opponents of the far right in the UK over the past five years. Like hundreds of people who have spoken out against the rise of the British National Party and other extremist groups, McFadden’s picture and home address have been collected by far right activists and posted on a website called Redwatch.

The site, which has links with the neo-Nazi organisation Combat 18 and a host of European fascist organisations, is hosted in the US but registered and run from the UK. It lists the personal details and shows the photographs of anti-racists – many taken during protests against the British National Party – alongside the slogan: “Remember places, traitors’ faces, they’ll all pay for their crimes.” This month a delegation of MPs and union activists will visit the Home Office to call for the site to be closed down. It is a familiar refrain and in the past officials have argued that because the site is hosted abroad, there is nothing they can do. However, Redwatch’s sister site in Poland, which was also hosted in the US, was recently closed down after collaboration between authorities in the the two countries, and Home Office minister Vernon Coaker has agreed to champion the campaign within government.

So seventy years after the police attempted to let Mosley march through the Jewish area of Cable Street, the Home Office protects the right of Mosley’s spiritual heirs to intimidate and attack leftwingers and antifascists.