The box that changed Britain

BBC Four has a “season” of programmes about the sea all last week and this week, with today an interesting documentary about containers: The Box that Changed Britain. Most of it is about the technology and its development, but it did at least touch on the human side of containerisation. Actually, for a BBC documentary it’s surprisingly honest about the bad effects containerisation had on the dockworkers and industry in general in Britain. Effects that were not inevitable, but the result of deliberate decisions made by industrialists and politicians.

The introduction of containers transformed the backbreaking labour of loading and unloading ships, reducing the small armies of workers needed to a bare handful, which should’ve been a good thing, but cost a great deal of hardship nonetheless. After all, in a world where the workers do not own the means of production, any invention that reduces the need for labour means people getting fired and thrown into inadequate social safety nets. It’s therefore not surprising, as the documentary shows, that the British dockworkers unions were largely hostile to containerisation, at least on the terms of the bosses. Their work might have gotten easier, but fewer people had to be employed and the work itself, while physically easier, was factorised, made less independent and more controlled, again seen in the scenes set in modern container ports showing how rigidly controlled the unloading/loading schedules are.

That’s not even counting the indirect impact of containerisation, as it made international trade so much easier and cheaper it put Asian countries into direct competition with Europe and America. Again, this is not necessarily a bad development, the transformation of national into international industries, but in a capitalist world the only way most of us profit from it is in supposedly cheaper prices and more choice in our consumer tat.

Now what?

So what’s going to happen now there’s a hung parliament in the UK? First, we need to remember the incessant background noise send out through the media from the City:

Of course, the guys in braces who pop up on Sky every five minutes aren’t lowering themselves to support any given party. What they all want is strong government, strong enough to take the necessary measures on the deficit, and they want it soon. Soon, like Monday morning? ventures the tremulous interviewer, as though in the presence of an oracle. Well, perhaps Tuesday afternoon at the latest, says man in braces, chewing his lip, but soon, or the markets will be displeased, as though this displeasure came from De Lawd Above and has nothing to do with him and his confreres.

Once again, this is much like the same pressure seen after the 2000 US presidental elections to get a quick decision, rather than the right decision, but then it was the Republican party itself, now it’s the “financial markets” directly, worrying that if the wrong government gets in they won’t deliver the deep spending cuts they want. Spending cuts that are needed to free up the money that’s needed for the UK government to pay back the billions it had to borrow to save the very same “financial markets” from their own fuckups two years ago. They want their pound of flesh and they need a “strong government”, preferably a dependable Tory one, to deliver it. It would mean that the scenes Johann Hari witnessed in Hammersmith and Fulham will be repeated all over the UK:

She “panicked” when a bill came through saying she had to pay £12.50 for every hour of care she needed. “I thought, ‘Oh my God, how am I going to do this?’ The more care you need, the higher your bill, so the most disabled people got the highest charges. Everyone was distraught. I had friends who had to choose between having the heating on in winter and paying for their care … I know a 90-year-old woman with macular degeneration who can’t see, and she had to stop her services. There are lots of people who have been left to rot, with nobody checking any more that they’re OK, and I’m sure some of them have ended up in hospital or have died.” One of the council’s senior social services managers seems to have confirmed this, warning in a leaked memo that the charges could place the vulnerable “at risk”.

Debbie co-founded an organisation to fight back – the Hammersmith and Fulham Coalition Against Community Care Cuts – and, after appealing, she finally had her charges cancelled. “But there are a lot of people who can’t appeal,” she says. “You’re talking about very vulnerable people – the very old, the mentally ill, the blind. A lot don’t know how, or would be ruled to have to pay anyway, because the rules are so arbitrary. Now they’re being taken to debt-collection agencies for non-payment. I know an 82-year-old woman who’s never been in debt in her life who is being taken to a debt-collection agency for care she needs just to keep going… They want volunteers to do it instead. But you don’t want to have to ask your friends or a volunteer to pull up your knickers for you.”

That’s why it’s good Gordon Brown has not resigned and should resist the pressure to resign; it makes it that much harder to install a Tory government by coup de main. The weak link is of course Nick Clegg: is he tough enough to stand up to pressure to form a government with the Tories rather than with Labour, tough enough not to be fobbed off with vague promises of electorial reform. If we look at the popular vote more than half the voters voted for left of center parties, so selling a Tory-Liberal coalition as “the will of the voters” is a bit of a cheek, but that seems to be the recieved wisdom the media are parroting. Don’t do it Nick!

On Kindle will reading highlights become ads?

In the same vein as that Facebook security leak that’s gotten Palau annoyed over at Prog Gold, here comes another scary story about how we’re losing our privacy and paying for the priviledge. This time it’s the Kindle that’s at the heart of it. Via Matt Ruff:

The Amazon Kindle, Kindle for iPhone and Kindle for iPad each provide a very simple mechanism for adding highlights. Every month, Kindle customers highlight millions of book passages that are meaningful to them.

We combine the highlights of all Kindle customers and identify the passages with the most highlights. The resulting Popular Highlights help readers to focus on passages that are meaningful to the greatest number of people. We show only passages where the highlights of at least three distinct customers overlap, and we do not show which customers made those highlights…

Matt invented a similar scheme for his novel Bad Monkeys, involving a bug in the spine of physical books noting how long you spent reading each page, so he’s a bit miffed somebody made his paranoid fantasy real. The next step is to sell ads based on this data… It reminds me slightly of the soup ads the German publisher of Terry Pratchett’s Discworld novels used to insert in his books. They’re not his publisher anymore.

Kyrgyzstan

Does anybody know what’s going on in Kyrgyzstan? Massive riots there in the past few days, as showcased in the video below:



From Wikipedia:

The riots stem from growing anger against the government of President Kurmanbek Bakiyev and the sluggish economy, and follow the government’s closure of several media outlets. Protesters took control of a government office in Talas on April 6, and on April 7 clashes between protesters and police in the capital Bishkek turned violent. At least 65 deaths and 400 injuries have been confirmed.[2] Overnight it was reported that President Bakiyev had fled the capital in his private jet south to Osh, and that opposition leaders were forming a new government led by former foreign minister Roza Otunbayeva.[3][4]

The 2005 Tulip Revolution doesn’t seem to have brought the desired results then: the government brought down now is the same as was swept to power then. The Tulip Revolution was the result of a genuine frustration and anger swept up into a manufactured revolution and as the sadly defunct blog Apostate Windbag pointed out at the time, this was likely to dissappoint and lead to a desire for a new and better revolution. Judging by what’s being reported as happening this time, the new revolts have not been co-opted (yet), aren’t stage managed and p.r. friendly.

On a more general note, I have the feeling that what’s happening in Kyrgyzstan will be repeated elsewhere soon and we’re in for a rough decade. The media might make optimistic noises about the end to the economic crisis, but for countries like Kyrgyzstan where in the past two decades things have only gotten worse it’s far from over. We’re seeing the end result of several decades of unrestricted capitalism and it’s no wonder it’s the more vulnerable countries that bubble over: they have nothign left to lose.

Your Happening World (10)

Stuff worth mentioning: