What postal liberalisation has done to us

Three key paragraphs out of James Meek’s excellent LRBarticle on post office privetisation in the Netherlands and the UK:

Somewhere in the Netherlands a postwoman is in trouble. Bad health, snow and ice and a degree of chaos in her personal life have left her months behind on her deliveries. She rents a privatised ex-council flat with her partner and so many crates of mail have built up in the hallway that it’s getting hard to move around. Twice a week one of the private mail companies she works for, Selektmail, drops off three or four crates of letters, magazines and catalogues. She sorts and delivers the fresh crates but the winter backlog is tough to clear. She thinks her employers are getting suspicious. I counted 62 full mail crates stacked up in the hall when I visited recently. There was a narrow passageway between the wall of crates and her personal pile of stuff: banana boxes, a disused bead curtain, a mop bucket. One of the crates has crept into the study, where the postwoman’s computer rears up out of her own archival heaps of newspapers and magazines. Should these two streams of paper merge they would not be easily separated. The postwoman hasn’t given up. She had a similar problem with the other private mail company she works for, Sandd, a few years back. ‘When I began at Sandd in 2006 I delivered about 14 boxes of mail every time,’ she said. ‘I couldn’t cope and at Christmas 2006 I had about 90 of these boxes in the house. By New Year’s Day we had 97. There were even boxes in the toilet.’ The postwoman is paid a pittance to deliver corporate mail. She hasn’t done her job well, yet so few people have complained about missed deliveries that she hasn’t been found out.

[…]

Every week Dutch households and businesses are visited by postmen and postwomen from four different companies. There are the ‘orange’ postmen of the privatised Dutch mail company, trading as TNT Post but about to change their name to PostNL; the ‘blue’ postmen of Sandd, a private Dutch firm; the ‘yellow’ postmen of Selekt, owned by Deutsche Post/DHL; and the ‘half-orange’ postmen of Netwerk VSP, set up by TNT to compete cannibalistically against itself by using casual labour that is cheaper than its own (unionised) workforce. TNT delivers six days a week, Sandd and Selekt two, and VSP one. From the point of view of an ardent free-marketeer, this sounds like healthy competition. Curiously, however, none of the competitors is prospering. TNT is being forced by the hedge funds and other transnational shareholders who control its destiny to split up, even as it tries to beautify its bottom line by replacing reasonably paid jobs with badly paid ones. Deutsche Post is pulling out of the Netherlands and selling Selekt to Sandd – a company that has never made a profit.

[…]

Van Hulten, who is 81, is still an activist, an idealist. The privatisation of the mail depresses him; the latest privatisation, of Holland’s local transport networks, makes him angry: the three bus companies supposedly competing in Lelystad, he said, are all owned by the same French firm. ‘Today’s Wednesday, yeah?’ he said. ‘On Wednesday, we have at least six people coming to the door, all bringing some mail. First was the local paper. Then the other local paper. Then the postman comes. Three more will come later. I think that’s the basic defect of post office privatisation. What used to be done by one man is now done by six. They’re all underpaid, and the delivery hasn’t improved. It used to come in the morning, and now I’m still waiting.’

Privatisation and competition in the mail market has literally had no positive effect whatsoever in the Netherlands. For the workers it has meant increasing casualisation, the increasing shedding of good jobs and the replacement by piecemail work that does not pay a living wage. For customers, both sending and recieving, it has meant a much less reliable postal service with post arriving later than we’re used to and less often than we were used to. For the companies themselves, it hasn’t even meant profits, almost as if companies like Sandd or Selectmail were founded just to force through this process of casualisation. Only the Dutch Post/KPN/TNT/TNT Post has been able to profit, making more money with less workers than using these profits to buy out other companies rather than do anything useful with it, in an orgy of supposed creative destruction. That sort of thing keeps the board of directors and their consultants in ready money, sometimes even the shareholders, but it kills everybody else. To add insult to injury TNT last year threatened its workers with mass redundancies unless they agreed to an (iirc) 15 percent pay cut. They lost that fight, but the trend is clear.

A run of the mill story of capitalist betrayal, but in TNT’s case it hurts me more because I used to work for the fsckers, back when being a postal worker still meant something, even if like me you only did it on Saturdays to get me through college, or rather fuel my comix habit. That was when even a parttime job with the post office paid well and people who came with nothing but a willingness to work hard and no adversion to starting early could get into a job that offered good pay and safety for years if not decades, without having to worry about having a proper career. I spent my Saturdays with men and women who had done their rounds for ten, twenty, thirty years and still liked the work, even though the first grumblings at the changes the socalled free market demanded had appeared. These days, who would want to be a postman if it means hard and increasingly harder, dumb, unappreciated work delivering unwanted junk mail slightly cheaper for big multinationals and be paid below minimum wage?

Market reform at the post office has destroyed or is destroying one of the proudest bastions of the working class, has destroyed a whole system of jobs open to anyone, not just to people with the right university papers and a business driven attitude. This is not a coincidence.

Fake charity

advert for Kika bracelets

At Unfogged they’re annoyed at the juvenile I Love Boobies anti-breast cancer campaign both for its inherent sexism and it’s misguided focus on outdated detection methods. Coincidently, yesterday I got annoyed at a similar sort of charitable campaign at the local hospital S. is staying in (until tomorrow). As you can see from the picture above, in the public canteen they’re now selling these anti-cancer bracelets to benefit Kika. Kika, which stands for “KInderen KAnkervrij” or “children cancer free” is a charity that sponsors research for combatting cancer in children and which supports the seven cancer centra that do this sort of research in the Netherlands. A worthwhile cause and there’s nothing wrong by supporting it by selling some token of compassion for it — unless it costs twelve euro fifty of which only one euro goes to the charity it supposedly supports!

Because that sounds remarkably like using this charity to get rid of the cheap tat you cannot sell on its own merits.

Of course not

Alex asks whether politicians learned anything from the News of the World phone hacking scandal:

Also, did the central government have any communications security at all? Did CESG or MI5 not have anything at all to say about this? Didn’t any of them just change their damn password, or even change their damn number?

Of course not. As a class politicians are the group most clueless about ICT and worst placed to make decisions on anything to do with it and that gets worse the higher up the ranks you get. Most modern politicians these days have never been anything but politicians and in that job you only need a pc as a glorified typewriter, while once you get high enough on the ladder the normal computer scutwork most of us have to deal with day to day can all be fobbed off on interns who’ll print out all the important documents for you. So I doubt they’ve spent any time at all thinking about communications security.

Case in point: several Dutch politicians got hit with a variant of what the News of the World did recently, as investigative reporters from the newsshow Één Vandaag “hacked” their voicemails by trying the standard Vodaphone pincode on them. Quite a few ministers turned out not to have bothered resetting this or even knew that they had to do that. Worse, neither did their IT department. Personally I think having voicemail at all is way too much of a security risk anyway and I’d switch it off altogether if I were in such a responsible function, but than that’s too much of a hassle.

What doesn’t help either is that is how much party political business is interwoven with government responsibilities for modern politicians, meaning that there’s a high risk for cross pollution anway. In an ideal world government ministers would have two or three separate mobiles: one for their job, one for journalists and party workers to reach them on and another for the family, but I suspect most people use the same phone for everything…