Amsterdam garbage strike: a new workers offensive

garbage piling up in Amsterdam

As I warned last month, the municipal garbage collectors in Amsterdam went on strike following Queensday, though waiting until after Memorial and Liberation Day. A week later and the garbage has started to pile up everywhere, both in the streets and at every collection point. This isn’t helped by those assholes who decide to profit from the strike by dumping commercial waste as well. Luckily the weather has been cold enough that stench hasn’t been a problem yet, though with the promise of warmer weather next week and the strike continuing all that rotting garbage may become a health hazard…

The garbage strike is just one tool the unions are using to try and get the joint municipal employers back to the negotiation table; earlier the parking ticket collectors had a one day strike (very popular) and there have been a few big demos as well. It’s a sign of the growing militancy and changing role of the unions how quickly they’ve used such an aggressive tactic however.

It didn’t used to be this way. For years, if not decades, the unions had become little more than negotiating partners for business and government, operating on a policy of compromise in what has become known as the “poldermodel“, with strikes becoming rare and ritualised pressure tools. It meant a certain amount of social stability, but the price was a growing irrelevancy of the unions to the average worker who did not see the need for union membership anymore, or at best saw it as equivalent to membership in a fitness club. As socialists like Anton Pannekoek warned about more than eighty years ago, unions had become just another tool to manage and control workers.

But in the past decade this has slowly changed. Partially this has been forced upon the unions, as the political climate in the Netherlands changed and became more openly rightwing, but not entirely so. There’s also been an internal radicalisation, a growing willingness to fight rather than compromise, as well as the realisation that the unions needed to change to become relevant again, could not longer permit themselves the luxury of only defending rights already won. One result has been a growing internationalisation of union struggles, for example in the fight to stop the EU-wide liberalisation of sea ports. The other has been a revamp of tactics and methology, heavily influenced by the experiences US unions have had in organising workers in traditionally weak and vulnerable trades, like the hotel cleaners as immortalised in Ken Loach’s Bread and Roses. A lot of these lessons were on display in the earlier cleaners strike I’ve reported on before, were the struggle was organised together with the (non-unionised) cleaners themselves, and instead of impossible mass strikes various companies were surgically targeted.

The current civil servant strike is done in the same spirit, with a series of short, smart actions rather than one long strike. So you had a public rally first, to get people’s blood up, followed by a one day strike by parking ticket collectors to hurt the city councils in their wallets, followed by the garbage strike to make it both public and impossible to ignore. Behind that and less visible in both strikes, as well as elsewhere are less visible and actually quite oldfashioned methods to get workers organised, by union activist actually going to a workplace and talk with workers there, persuade people to become unionised, get a nucleus of such workers to organise the rest of the workforce and if necessary use the same sort of smart, targeted strikes to force concessions from the bosses. And the best thing about this is that finally the unions have stopped doing purely defensive strikes, defending rights already fought for and won decades earlier, but have gone on the offensive, winning rights for those groups of people not having them yet.

A clean victory

we want bread but roses too
“We want bread but roses too.”

I see Jay Vos has already linked to the news about the cleaners strike, commenting on my previous post on the subject. The longest strike in Dutch history since 1933 ended in a well deserved victory for the cleaners yesterday. A binding agreement between the unions and employers has now been reached, which will see all cleaners recieve a 3,5 percent wage increase over two years, an added bonus for union members and strikers as well as free language lessons during working hours for those cleaners with limited knowledge of Dutch. It’s great news and proof that unions are still relevant and necessary, can do more than perfunctorily defend rights build up decades ago.

The cleaners strike then is an important watershed in union militancy, providing a direction for future struggles:

  • Cleaning has been outsourced by most companies and government organisations and hence competition is now completely price driven — despite talk from some customers about ethical handvest and sustainable contracts and all that at the end of the day bullshit talks and money walks.
  • Labour is responsible for at least eighty percent of the total costs of cleaning, hence there’s huge pressure to keep labour costs as low as possible, by keeping wages low and targets high.
  • And since cleaning is “unskilled” work, largely unattractive to anybody with better options (how many students clean office buildings as a summer job) it’s mainly people who can’t find other work, or don’t have the right education, or can’t work regular hours because of other responsibilities (children), including many (recent) immigrants. Union participation therefore is low as well.
  • Unlike the traditional union role therefore, the FNV had to be pro-active: actively recruiting new members while immediately campaigning with limited resources to improve working conditions. The unions had to prove themselves to the workforce.
  • They did this with targeted campaigns. Last year it was cleaning strikes at Schiphol airport; this year it was a general strike, but again set up to have a miximum impact with minimal resources. In total there were less than a 1,000 strikers or so (not all union members either) on a total of 50,000 or so cleaners nation wide.
  • So the strikers targeted highly visible customers like Schiphol and the railways, as well as semi-govermental organisations like the UWV (social security benefits). For example, they held a public sitdown strikes in Utrecht Centraal railway station, which is the busiest in the Netherlands. And it worked: public sympathy was high and remained high for the strikes, while the effects of the strike became increasingly noticable as it continued.
  • In a broader context the effect of the victory is benificial not just for the cleaners, but for the unions and workers as a whole. It showed the power of the unions without them coming across as bullies, which is often difficult to avoid in a hostile media environment. For once the unions were also on the offensive rather than the defensive and success here will make it easier to gain victories elsewhere.

Garbage collectors on strike with Queensday

garbage left behind after Queensday 2009

The picture above shows just a little of the garbage left over at the end of Queensday last year. Held on the 30th of April, the birthday of our previous queen, Queensday is one of our most important holidays, in which we can indulge in our traditional vices of drink and commerce. It’s a day when, as one wag described it, one half of the Dutch population is selling the contents of their attics to the other half and the city in which the most of this is done is Amsterdam, party central on Queensday. It all makes for quite a lot of mess.

And this year the garbage collectors are threatening to strike. Not just on the day, but the entire week from Queensday, which also includes a potential Ajax championship celebration as well as Rememembrance Day on May 4th and Liberation Day on May 5th. It’s perhaps the worst period in the year to have this strike, hence a good way for the unions to pressure the city.

For the garbage collectors are not just striking for themselves, but for all municipal civil servants. The demands are modest — basically wanting to keep salary levels matching inflation — but the Dutch city councils have refused so far to meet them. My sympathies therefore are with the garbage collectors and I’ll make sure to keep my own (modest) garbage safe until the end of the strike…

An Undutch strike

Gansch het vuile werk ligt stil, als uw machtige arm het wel -- from http://twitter.com/SPUtrecht/status/10792473205

The Dutch are not a very militant people, more given to trashing out labour relations through negotian than through strike action, especially since the agreement the unions reached back in ’82 with the government and employers’ organisations to trade wage rises for employment. Ever since union militancy has been on a low level, with occasional flareups, but mostly existing in a cozy symbiosis with the employers and the government. Not anymore though. The last few years, even before the economic crisis hit, have seen a growing number of disputes and the crisis has given them a new urgency. At the forefront of this new militancy are the cleaners.

The cleaning industry is one of the least organised branches of industry, employing people who have little or no other options for employment, often migrants, legal or otherwise. It’s badly paid and little respected, with the workers only judged on how fast they work. Most if not all cleaning these days is outsourced, which means that any and all cleaning contracts are soley judged on how little they cost, which in turn means a race to the bottom: not gpood for the workers themselves, but little better for their customers.

In the last few years Holland’s biggest union, FNV Bondgenoten (full disclosure: also my union) has been busy organising the cleaners, last year resulting in succesful strike action at Schiphol airport. With the confidence this gave the union went into negations with the cleaning companies for a sector wide binding agreement on cleaners’ wages and benefits. These negotiations failed, with the employers refusing to negotiate seriously about the union’s demands. In response, the union went on strike — which was six weeks ago.

Which makes this strike the longest since 1933! In my own office, at a semi-governmental agency which shall remain nameless, our desks haven’t been cleaned since, while the most public face of the strike are the railway stations, as the Dutch railways is one of the companies suffering from the strike. For those of y’all visiting the Netherlands in the past few weeks; our stations are not normally this filthy. Such a long strike is very undutch as one of the organisers put it (in Dutch).

But what are the cleaners striking for? Not just for better wages, abysmally low as they are now, the cleaners are only asking for two dimes extra per hour for this year and the next. What’s just as important or perhaps even more so is to get respect, the sort of basic amenities white collar workers (like, erm, me) take for granted. Things like training, travel benefits, even being able to use the company canteens where you work. Which is why the cleaners are not just targeting their own companies, but their customers. Customers like the railways, Schiphol Airport, the Free University and the Dutch unemployments benefits agency are role models for how less visible companies treat the cleaners. If they treat them right, others will be less likely to mistreat them and only these sort of big, powerful companies are able to force the cleaning companies to seriously negotiate.

The cleaners’ struggle is an important one not just for the cleaners themselves, but for all workers in the Netherlands. This is not a defensive strike, a defence of existing rights, but an offensive strike, to build up new rights, part of the union’s broader strategy to mobilise and improve the rights of workers in the weakest, least organised parts of the “labour market”. If it succeeds, it will be a powerful step forward for FNV Bondgenoten; if it fails…