Blunkett resigns, again

Something of habit with him:

David Blunkett has said he is “deeply sorry” for the embarrassment he has caused Tony Blair, after
he resigned as work and pensions secretary.

He said he was guilty of making a mistake on three occasions and was now “paying the price for it”.

Tony Blair has paid tribute to Mr describing him as a “decent and honourable man”.

Gag me with a spoon. It’s Bush that has the reputation of not wanting to let go of his fuckup “friends”
but Blair’s just as bad, isn’t he? Blunkett, Mandelson, even Estelle Morris all resigned in disgrace only
to return to the fold not that much later.

In the Commons, Mr Blair told MPs that none of the allegations against Mr Blunkett warranted his
dismissal under the ministerial code, saying: “I could discover no impropriety or wrongdoing.”

The mistakes arose out of an “honest misunderstanding”, he said, and Mr Blunkett had left office “with
no stain of impropriety against him whatsoever”.

When did we hear that before? Oh yes, the previous time Blunkett resigned “with his integrity intact”. Not very many secretaries can resign from office twice and say that!

Most politicians who had to resign in shame stay resigned, but not Blunkett. He has now joined Mandelson in that short list of politicians who had to resign twice; one wonders if a fatcat job in Europe can be far behind…

The way in which this happened is typical of Blunkett: arrogant and stupid. I can’ help but think a lot of this has to do with his background. He is so used for fighting for what he wants and winning, to succeed in spite of the odds that I think he has
started to think that he can do anything, that rules are for lesser men. How else to explain that he thought he could get away with taking up a directorship of DNA Bioscience, purchasing shares in it, taking these shares into a family trust when he became a secretary again, without telling the advisory committee on business appointments about it and with the company having an active interest in the business of his department!

More on Blunkett’s resignation

Recently started blogging again Take it as Red has a good encapsulation of why Blunkett was so horrible and what did him in:

Apparently Tony, the expert on integrity and honesty – where are those WMD, Mr Blair?- thinks Blunkett “…is a force for good”. No, no and again no. He’s a selfish, selfish man whose first loyalty is to himself and no-one else. Everything he has done has been about how he himself feels; he has shown no consideration towards his duty to the country, let alone any human concern for his ex- mistress or putative child or even his existing family, and his main concern all along has been that he escape the consequences of his actions. Why else would he appear on BBC2’s Newsnight last night, looking for the sympathy vote and telling the world “It was all worth it for that little lad”? He does not even know the child is his, except by some magical sixth sense, and even if it were he is merely the biological parent. How ironic if the DNA test proves the child is the husband’s.

The BBC has been enjoying this a lot, and I don’t blame them one bit. As I said in an earlier post, it’s the Establishment that will do for New Labour, and now the Establishment has the smell of blood in its collective nostrils. The letters and emails that have come to light would never have done so without the co-operation of the civil service; the story wouldn’t have had legs if Blunkett, in his hubris, hadn’t continued to bombard the BBC with constant protestations of his honesty; in doing so he gave the BBC and Civil Service just the ammunition they needed.

Indeed.

Ding-dong the witch is dead!

Blunkett finally resigned.

Too bad it wasn’t for his blatant disregard for the rule of law and civil rights, but at least we know now that smary hypocritical Labour weasels can be brought down just as well as their Tory counterparts could in the eighties and nineties.

David Blunkett looking like a dickhead

For those who don’t know why Blunkett resigned, it all started when his affair with a married woman was revealed; soon after it turned out that he may have …helped his lover, Kimberly Quinn (publisher of the rightwing Spectator) in various ways, including fast tracking visa applications for her nanny. It then turned out she was pregnant with her second child, which may or may not be Blunkett’s,which did not stop him from starting a lawsuit against Mrs Quinn to obtain access rights to her two year old son, which he apparantely believes is his and with whom he has been parading as his own son when he went on holidays with Mrs Quinn…

Apart from the legalities of it all, the hypocrisy of it all is quite astounding. The sheer cheek of somebody who sees no bone in sueing his pregnant ex-lover, a married woman over visiting rights to her son which may or not be fathered by him, lecturing others on morals. Incredible.

It certainly makes me Proud of Britain to see him gone.
Now for the rest of the cabinet…

Now the question is who will be the new Home Secretary: Peter “incompetent” Hain perhaps or Alan “who he?” Milburn. The other question is what will happen to Blunkett’s pet projects, like the national ID card he wanted to introduce.