Climate change denial hits Dutch government

Government party VVD wants to stop funding the KNMI, the Royal Meteorological Institute because it actually takes climate change seriously. According to member of parliament René Leegte the KNMI is a partisan organisation that listens too much to the IPCC (Dutch). What’s more, according to him twenty percent of the KNMI’s researchers work for the IPCC and are therefore certainly not to be trusted.

A shocking display of truthiness, roundly mocked in the Dutch media, but these accusations are done in the context of a debate about the possible privatisation of the KNMI. By throwing doubts about its independence and realibility Leegte attempts to make it easier to sell the idea of getting rid of it to parliament and the voter. It’s done very clumsily, but that it’s done at all is worrisome. More and more our rightwing parties are using Republican tactics to force through their ideologically driven policies.

Bruce Sterling reports on the Dutch War on Culture

Bruce Sterling comments on the philistinism of the current Dutch government’s arts policies:

“There are absolutely no policy reasons for the €200 million of cutbacks. This deal was struck with the PVV in exchange for its support in parliament of the minority cabinet. The intention is to inflict irreparable damage on an entire profession. Zijlstra is striving to decimate and eliminate this professional group’s creative, innovative and critical potential. Not a single member of his own party (VVD), or anyone from its coalition partner, the CDA (Christian Democratic Party) has opposed him. As far as they are concerned, traditional art is merely the superfluous ornamentation of a society. Contemporary art is labelled as alienating, and even, although no one actually says it out loud, as ‘degenerate art’.

The notion of “entarte kunst” does fit in well with the rightwing “populism” of the PVV and Wilders, as I also noted yesterday, but as Bruce Sterling indicates, the betrayal of the art by the supposedly respectable CDA and VVD is just as nihilistic. This is something that would not have been possible twenty or even ten years ago, but a decade of relentless rightwing philistinism in which everything had to be reappraised solely for its commercial potential has eroded the sense of social responsibility these parties used to hold. Obviously, there have alwas been disagreements over the arts and funding thereof; what’s new is the idea that they shouldn’t be funded at all, apart from very respectable high culture institutes like the Rijksmuseum or Concertgebouw. This is an ideologically driven attack, one that wants to make art safe for the rich and only aimed at their tastes.

Rightwing hobbies

Total cost of Dutch culture budget v total cost of JSF

So we got ourselves a rightwing minority goverment in the Netherlands a while back, who now rule with support of the racists aka Geert Willders and his “Freedom Party”. Wilders thanks his success by pandering to the worst prejudices of the socalled common man, while the government thanks its succes to pandering to Wilders. Which explains why while the government tries to sell us on how Maturely they are trying to handle the Very Serious Task of getting Holland’s finances back in order in the wake of the bankers’ crisis, the sort of measures they come up with is to slash the culture budget. As the picture on top shows, the total amount of money the government spents each year on culture is roughly 450 million euros: a lot of money, but nothing compared to the 7,6 billion euros it would cost to buy the F-35. So why is that sacrosant when cutting the cultural budget is only penny ante stuff?

Because stopping money being “wasted” on opera, theatre and other “leftwing hobbies” as Wilders put it, is a goal in itself for this government. It keeps Wilders and its voters happy, can be spun as showing how serious the government takes the budget deficits and pisses off the leftwing opposition. Who cares that it doesn’t help achieve its nominal goal as long as white elephants like the F-35 are kept fully funded but does destroy a lot of cultural capital?

Pure pandering. And to add insult to injury, not only are the budgets slashed, the value added tax paided on art and other cultural products will be upped as well, from six to nineteen percent. Except on porn. Because wanking is a rightwing hobby…

What postal liberalisation has done to us

Three key paragraphs out of James Meek’s excellent LRBarticle on post office privetisation in the Netherlands and the UK:

Somewhere in the Netherlands a postwoman is in trouble. Bad health, snow and ice and a degree of chaos in her personal life have left her months behind on her deliveries. She rents a privatised ex-council flat with her partner and so many crates of mail have built up in the hallway that it’s getting hard to move around. Twice a week one of the private mail companies she works for, Selektmail, drops off three or four crates of letters, magazines and catalogues. She sorts and delivers the fresh crates but the winter backlog is tough to clear. She thinks her employers are getting suspicious. I counted 62 full mail crates stacked up in the hall when I visited recently. There was a narrow passageway between the wall of crates and her personal pile of stuff: banana boxes, a disused bead curtain, a mop bucket. One of the crates has crept into the study, where the postwoman’s computer rears up out of her own archival heaps of newspapers and magazines. Should these two streams of paper merge they would not be easily separated. The postwoman hasn’t given up. She had a similar problem with the other private mail company she works for, Sandd, a few years back. ‘When I began at Sandd in 2006 I delivered about 14 boxes of mail every time,’ she said. ‘I couldn’t cope and at Christmas 2006 I had about 90 of these boxes in the house. By New Year’s Day we had 97. There were even boxes in the toilet.’ The postwoman is paid a pittance to deliver corporate mail. She hasn’t done her job well, yet so few people have complained about missed deliveries that she hasn’t been found out.

[…]

Every week Dutch households and businesses are visited by postmen and postwomen from four different companies. There are the ‘orange’ postmen of the privatised Dutch mail company, trading as TNT Post but about to change their name to PostNL; the ‘blue’ postmen of Sandd, a private Dutch firm; the ‘yellow’ postmen of Selekt, owned by Deutsche Post/DHL; and the ‘half-orange’ postmen of Netwerk VSP, set up by TNT to compete cannibalistically against itself by using casual labour that is cheaper than its own (unionised) workforce. TNT delivers six days a week, Sandd and Selekt two, and VSP one. From the point of view of an ardent free-marketeer, this sounds like healthy competition. Curiously, however, none of the competitors is prospering. TNT is being forced by the hedge funds and other transnational shareholders who control its destiny to split up, even as it tries to beautify its bottom line by replacing reasonably paid jobs with badly paid ones. Deutsche Post is pulling out of the Netherlands and selling Selekt to Sandd – a company that has never made a profit.

[…]

Van Hulten, who is 81, is still an activist, an idealist. The privatisation of the mail depresses him; the latest privatisation, of Holland’s local transport networks, makes him angry: the three bus companies supposedly competing in Lelystad, he said, are all owned by the same French firm. ‘Today’s Wednesday, yeah?’ he said. ‘On Wednesday, we have at least six people coming to the door, all bringing some mail. First was the local paper. Then the other local paper. Then the postman comes. Three more will come later. I think that’s the basic defect of post office privatisation. What used to be done by one man is now done by six. They’re all underpaid, and the delivery hasn’t improved. It used to come in the morning, and now I’m still waiting.’

Privatisation and competition in the mail market has literally had no positive effect whatsoever in the Netherlands. For the workers it has meant increasing casualisation, the increasing shedding of good jobs and the replacement by piecemail work that does not pay a living wage. For customers, both sending and recieving, it has meant a much less reliable postal service with post arriving later than we’re used to and less often than we were used to. For the companies themselves, it hasn’t even meant profits, almost as if companies like Sandd or Selectmail were founded just to force through this process of casualisation. Only the Dutch Post/KPN/TNT/TNT Post has been able to profit, making more money with less workers than using these profits to buy out other companies rather than do anything useful with it, in an orgy of supposed creative destruction. That sort of thing keeps the board of directors and their consultants in ready money, sometimes even the shareholders, but it kills everybody else. To add insult to injury TNT last year threatened its workers with mass redundancies unless they agreed to an (iirc) 15 percent pay cut. They lost that fight, but the trend is clear.

A run of the mill story of capitalist betrayal, but in TNT’s case it hurts me more because I used to work for the fsckers, back when being a postal worker still meant something, even if like me you only did it on Saturdays to get me through college, or rather fuel my comix habit. That was when even a parttime job with the post office paid well and people who came with nothing but a willingness to work hard and no adversion to starting early could get into a job that offered good pay and safety for years if not decades, without having to worry about having a proper career. I spent my Saturdays with men and women who had done their rounds for ten, twenty, thirty years and still liked the work, even though the first grumblings at the changes the socalled free market demanded had appeared. These days, who would want to be a postman if it means hard and increasingly harder, dumb, unappreciated work delivering unwanted junk mail slightly cheaper for big multinationals and be paid below minimum wage?

Market reform at the post office has destroyed or is destroying one of the proudest bastions of the working class, has destroyed a whole system of jobs open to anyone, not just to people with the right university papers and a business driven attitude. This is not a coincidence.

Low rent but effective



The political commercial shown above was made for the provincial elections last Wednesday, by a CDA candidate who was put on a normally unelectable place in his party’s election list. It shows a man and woman together in bed, the woman asking the man what his tattoos mean. He answers he doesn’t know but just likes how they look. The woman answers that she would never put something on her body she doesn’t understand and tells him she has a tattoo too: cue closeup of her bum with the CDA logo on it…

It led to a bit of controverse (the CDA not being a party much given to using sex to sell itself) but it got the guy noticed enough to get him elected. Sex sells, even in elections normally ignored by the great unwashed.