Fortis nationalised

Jump you fuckers!

This time last week Fortis was to be part-nationalised by the governments of Holland, Belgium and Luxembourg. Less than a week later, this drastic measure costing billions of euros was already ruled to be insufficient and now Fortis is to be broken up, with the Dutch part nationalised and the Belgian and Luxembourg parts sold to a French bank. Instead of the four billion euros that were to be paid last week for 49 percent of Fortis, the government will now pay some 17 billion euros for the entire kit and kaboodle. No longer will it be dependent on the vageries of the stock market but instead the rot is stopped and it’s safe under state control. A thriumph for socialism?

Hardly.

There’s a big difference between a proper nationalisation done by the workers for the workers and a nationalisation of last resort as been done here. Yes, the recieved economic wisdom of the past three decades has been that state owned companies are evil, inefficient and that everything should be left to the free market, but in reality capitalism has always been happy to let government clean up its messes. In this case, the government has made clear this is a temporary measure, with Fortis to be privatised again once it has stablised, the company will be run according to normal capitalist rules rather than for the common good and the day to day running of Fortis will remain in the hands of the same people who run it now. In other words, nothing will change and the only positive thing the government has done is rewarding the same people who almost ran Fortis in the ground with their slice of the seventeen billion euros…

What’s more, that seventeen billion had to be borrowed on the financial markets, so interests will need to be paid over it. Sure, the profits Fortis will make might cover these costs, but in the short term and the current climate this is unlikely. Which means there will be more budgetcuts next year, less to spend on social welfare, especially as we’re still comitted to fighting an expensive (and of course, immoral) war in Afghanistan which also doesn’t come cheap. This at a time when the need for social welfare will surely grow, considering the collapse of the world financial system going on around us and the effects on the real economy this
already has.

No, this isn’t socialism, this is just socialism of risks and privatisation of profits: same as it ever was.

Books read in September

Here are the books I’ve read last month. Not as many as usual, as I struggled with a couple of books.

Red Planet — Robert A. Heinlein
Another Heinlein juvenile, showing how one boy and his Martian pet cause the planet to succesfully rebel against an ever oppressive Earth.

Goths and Romans 332-489 — Peter Heather
I enjoyed Peter Heather’s The Fall of the Roman Empire and this is an earlier book of his, on a related subject, the relationship between the Goths and the Eastern Roman Empire during the period of the fall of the western Empire.

Spycatcher — Peter Wright
The autobiography of one of a former assistant directors of MI5, which caused a huge controversy when first published, to the point of being banned from publication in the UK itself. Particularly the revelation that Labour prime minister Harold Wilson had been spied upon by MI5 under suspicion of being a Soviet mole caused a lot of interest.

Tales — H. P. Lovecraft
Huge collection of Lovecraft stories edited by Peter Straub for the Library of America series. At roughly one story per quarrter hour commute, as well as two long train journeys, it still took me over a week to plow through this. Reading more than a few of these stories in one sitting isn’t recommended either, as the simularities and stylistic tics shared by them become increasingly visible.

De Wet op Internet — Arnoud Engelfriet
Arnoud is a Dutch blogger specialised in the intersection of the internet with the law. He has now written a clear, easy to understand book on the fundamentals of internet law in the Netherlands.

The Haunter of the Ring & Other Tales — Robert E. Howard
A collection of horror and weird mystery stories by the creator of Conan the Barbarian. More variety than the similar Lovecraft collection, but with the same undertone of racism, where race determines character and there’s nothing better than somebody from clean, Anglo Saxon stock.

Civilisation and Capitalism – The Wheels of Commerce — Fernand Braudel
The second volume in Braudel’s massive history of the early days of modern capitalism between the fifteenth and eighteenth centuries. This one looks at how commerce and capitalism developed in these centuries.

An Army at Dawn — Rick Atkinson
The story of the North African campaign from Operation Torch to the liberation of Tunis, from an American point of view. Well told and engrossing, a good book to get an idea from of how this campaign went for the Americans. Supposedly this is the first of a series, with the next volumes detailing the rest of the war in Europe.

Too Many Women — Rex Stout
A post-war Nero Wolfe mystery. Fun, dated and somewhat sexist.

CauseWired — Tom Watson
Tom Watson is a journalist and onlive activist who believes the future of social activism is online and attempts to sketch out this future here. Sounds trite at first, but he means more than just charities discovering the power of facebook or twitter. Once you get through the silicon snakeoil and marketing speech, there is a kernel of truth here.

Credit crunch hits Holland

Fortis executive flashes rescue plans

So there it was on every front page this morning: Fortis, one of the largest banking and insurance companies in the Netherlands has been nationalised. What’s more, it’s been nationalised by no less than three countries: Holland takes over 49 percent of the insurance branch and pays 4 billion dollars, Belgium pays 4.7 billion for the same percentage of the banking branch, while Luxembourg invests 2.5 billion euros in the Luxembourg based interests of Fortis. Finally, the ABN Amro bank, which Fortis had just bought the Dutch branch off less then a year ago is to be sold, perhaps to ING, another finance giant, best known for taking over Barings when Nick Leeson had managed to bankrupt it…

So far the effects of the American mortgage crisis and subsequent credit crunch seemed to have barely hit the Netherlands, but with this part nationalisation it seems we too are no longer immune to it. The big question is whether Fortis is just the first to fail, or whether like the UK or America, we’ll see the whole financial sector collapse like a house of cards. There are other banks who, like Fortis, had to write off investments in the American mortgage markets this year and last, but none of these losses, including those of Fortis are big enough on their own to bring down any of the big banks. What made Fortis vulnerable was much simpler: a decision to get involved in a long and expensive hostile takeover at the exact moment that it became clear just how much of a disaster the US mortgage situation really was. This meant that Fortis had to find billions of euros it didn’t have itself to pay for its share of ABN AMro at a time when nobody was willing or able to lend it to them as cashw as tied up in the every increasing death spiral of the US mortgages.

So Fortis lost a lot of money, its shares plummetted and its customers moved their savings to other, more safer banks. Despite frequent denials and optimistic press releases, the end was near. Negotiations between Fortis and the Dutch, Belgian and Luxembourg governments started this weekend, and when one Fortis executive left the meeting on Sunday night, details of the rescue plan were clearly readable on the concept agreement he flashed the press, as seen in the picture. Which is how we know ABN Amro is to be sold and the chairman will lose his job, as officially only the part nationalisation has been agreed upon.

I’ve got mixed feelings about this. While it’s fun to gloat about how quickly dyed in the wool capitalists are converted to “socialism” when it’s their ass on the line, this isn’t the kind of socialism that actually benefits the workers themselves. What’s more, with the current plan the government doesn’t even get a controlling stake in Fortis, so has little to show for its generous investment. And generous it certainly is to pump four billion euros into a doddering company when plans to provide e.g. daycare for everybody founder on millions rather than billions. It puts the lie to the oft heard argument that “we just can’t afford” higher social benefits, or improved healthcare, or anything else that would actually improve the lives of ordinary people. Especially when you see how much money Fortis has wasted chasing after ABN Amro…

Excusing police murders

An old and noble tradition amongst the Law’nOrder set, where the shooting of a Brazilian electrician on the way to work or IRish looking guy on his way back from the pub carrying a tableleg in his bag is excused on the grounds that their murderers though they were a suicide bomber, or were carrying a sawnoff shotgun and besides, don’t you know how hard their job is? Case in point, little Nicky Cohen’s column in The Evening Standard, as excerpted by Aaronovitch Watch:

In the hubbub a simple point is being lost. I don’t want to defend the Met’s mistakes but it is blindingly obvious that when the police think they are confronting suicide bombers they will shoot first and ask questions later.If they didn’t, and a terrorist detonated a bomb on the Tube, they would be denounced by the very people who are shouting loudest about the death of poor Mr de Menezes.

He also mumbles something about how the left was pleased to see De Menezes killed, so they had something to blame the police for, a standard Cohen projection, as witnessed by his own delight at the 7/7 bombings and how that showed up the left. Disgusting as that is, it isn’t new. More interesting is that belief that the police should be allowed to kill people as long as the cops sincerily believe that they’re bad people. Surely that’s just a licence to kill, as the cops can always gin up some story to justify their actions. (Or to smear their victims, as happened to de Menezes, but also to the suspects in the Forest Gate affair.)

Cohen wants to argue that the system works because there’s now an inquest into the de Menezes murder, but as I said earlier, this was explicitely set up not to assign blame, while the Crown Prosecution Services had already decided earlier to not do their job, after being blackmailed with massive police walkouts if they had. Instead there was an absurdistic health and safety prosecution agains the Metroplotian Police as a whole. No real incentive not to murder somebody there: nobody prosecuted, no careers cut short by this mistake, just a court order to one arm of the state to pay a fine to another arm. And Cohen thinks this is evidence that he’s living “in a country that takes breaches of its rules so seriously”? If so, do I have a bridge to sell him…

Disgusting as it is, Cohen’s bilge does accurately state the gut reflex of a lot of voters, “decenthardworkingfamilies” who like to believe they will never be the victim of police brutality themselves, but think that it is necessary to protect them, even if the occasional unfortunate accident happens. And even then the victims must’ve done something wrong to deserve it…

Brewery ‘t IJ is saved …for now

Sometimes putting the spotlight of publicity on bureaucracies doing deeply stupid things works, as the Amsterdam city council has decided to review its policy against people drinking alcohol on pub terraces whilst standing. For some reason this idea that people were drinking beer without sitting down for it was deeply offensive to the numbnuts of stadsdeel centrum especially, which led to a fine for Brewery ‘t IJ, one of the places where you least expect alcohol related trouble. Now the city has, while not abandoning this policy, chosen to be much more casual about enforcing it. Which is just as well what with the ban on smoking in pubs that came into force last July. Hopefully this relaxation of the law will mean no more warnings for the pub, which otherwise might have to close.