Nationalise the succesful companies, not the failures

As someone who had been saying for the past few years that things like Nixonian wage and price controls would be considered beyond the pale in a world that, I thought, understood and appreciated some basics of free markets more than it did 35 years ago, well, it’s a good thing my jaw has dropped so much on the past week’s news that I have room to fit a lot of crow.

Is there anything more sad than a disillusioned libertarian once he discovers his beloved mistress capitalism isn’t as pure as he thought she was, but is quite willing to undergo intervention if that suits her interests? Well, yes. Brian Doherty’s discomfort is after all safely theoretical, a vague unease that the economic laws to which he dedicated his political life are being overturned now capitalism has failed again and the people responsible need the help of the state to bail them out, again. Unlike like many of the people who’ve lost their jobs, their houses or both in the process, Brian’s safe. Capitalism always needs its useful idiots.

One such useful idiot is the near-mythical taxpayer, who is going to pay the costs of all those emergency nationalisations and bailouts their governments have committed themselves to, from Northern Rock to AIG. Because it’s never the strong, succesful companies that are taken over, but the wrecks left behind once the shareholders and executives have sucked them dry. Not that there’s anything new to this pattern. Remember Railtrack?

Or, further back, look at which industries were nationalised by the great social democratic governments of Europe in that great wave of nationalisations after World War II, especially in Britain. The railways, coal mines, British Leyland, all industries that were in trouble, losing their profitability anyway, to the point were state interference is welcomed as much as resented. And it then fell to the state to dismantle these industries and deal with the fallout of this, like a eneration of unemployed miners after the 1984 Miner Strike. Even those industries that were re-privatised by succesive Tory and Labour governments still leaned heavily on government support, directly or indirectly.

Which is whay nationalism this way isn’t a victory for socialism or even social democracy, but just another way in which profits are privatised but risk nationalised. What we need is not the propping up of empty husks, but the nationalisation and put into the public trust of all key industries, a reworking of society in such a way that cooperation, not competition is its central
organising feature, where “to each according to their needs, from each according to their abilities” is its motto. To do anything else is just keeping capitalism alive to cause more disaster.

No justice for Jean (did you expect anything else?)

Oh look, it’s another pointless inquest to establish what we already know, that Jean Charles de Menezes was murdered, that his killers got away with it and of course, that this inquest is “not a forum to determine
culpability or compensation, still less to dispense punishment”. It’s not as if anybody important was killed and we can’t have the police be afraid to murder innocent people if they really really believe they’re terrorists…

The inquest will hear from 75 witnesses, including 48 serving police officers who have been granted anonymity, and Tube passengers.

The first police officer will appear later in the week.

Among those who will be speaking for the first time will be policemen codenamed C2 and C12, the two specialist firearms officers who shot Mr de Menezes dead.

Far be it for me to say that this is the perfect opportunity for some spontaneous vigilante justice, but what the hey.

Amsterdam: brewery ‘t IJ to close?

Brewery ‘t IJ is a small local Amsterdam beer brewer-cum pub where they still brew beer for the love of it. Founded in 1985 it has become one of the best small brewers in the Netherlands, while the pub is mellow and popular with serious beer fans as well as the more casual drinker. No wonder then that the Amsterdam city council is trying to shut it down. And why are they trying to close ‘t IJ down? Not because its customers are causing trouble, not because there are fistfights every night or lots of drunken people crawling home all hours of the night (a bit difficult as the pub is only open from three in the afternoon untill eight in the evening), not even because people are smoking in the pub . Nothing of that is going on, so why is Amsterdam city council (or rather, the Stadsdeel Centrum sub-council, a bigger collection of NIMBYes and prigs not seen in this country) trying to shut down Brewery ‘t IJ

Because their customers are drinking their beer outside, on the terraces, — are you ready — standing up!

Yes, really. It its verboten to drink while standing up, even though you’re doing so on licensed premises. And they’re actually checking up on this as well, with ‘t IJ having gotten two warnings already. Next time it will be a fivehundred euro fine, then a thousand euro one and if that doesn’t
help, the pub will have to shut down for a week. Worse, any warnings on file will remain there for two years. The reason for this policy? Gods know, nobody else does.

As the AT5 news report shows, try and explain this to your customers, especially when half or more are from outside Amsterdam and not used to the petty rule lawyering of Stadsdeel Centrum, which has also been known to ban rainbow flags as “intrusive advertising”. What sane person would suspect drinking standing up, on the pub terrace would be a problem?

Suspicious as I am, I wonder why Stadsdeel Centrum has embarked on this policy. Is it just another example of the way they try to bully everything out of the city centre that doesn’t fit their idea of a nice little suburbanised Amsterdam, a sort of Vienna-lite but without the charm? Or is theresomething more sinister going on?

(Found at Komma punt Log.)

Solicitere

It’s back to the eighties again, considering the complete and utter collapse of the Anglo-American financial world and the sombre news from the budget in Den Haag: can mass unemployment be far behind? If so, this old classic by the Janse Bagge Bend is shockingly relevant again.

Why am I not suprised?

It’s long been demonstrated, by such purveyors of wingnuttia like Alicublog and Decent Leftspotters like Aaronovitch Watch, that wingnuts tend to run in circles. Get slightly dotty about the Muslims and before you know it you don’t believe in evolution anymore, think giving women the right to vote was a bad idea and abortion a crime against humanity. It’s not enough to just believe in one patently false evil belief, no, once you go wingnut, you go wingnut all the way.

So it came as no suprise when, according to DutchNews, one of the Islamophobes of Geert Wilders’ anti-immigration party is revealed to be clueless about climate change as well, denying the melting of the Arctic:

‘Our schoolchildren should be learning to spell and do sums not that pathetic polar bears are drifting around on ice floes because we go on holiday by plane,’ the paper quotes him as saying.

And yet this party won nine seats at the last elections and is consistently predicted to do even better next time. Makes you proud to be Dutch.