free Palestine, end the genocide, and the BBC is complicit

Over at Dazed, James Greig talks to Callum Johnson-Mills, who took the opportunity of being interviewed by the BBC over his A-level results to say “free Palestine, end the genocide, and the BBC is complicit”:

She also said, ‘Gaza is a whole different subject’, but I don’t think you can make that separation. You can’t escape this, no matter how hard you try, even on A-level results day. I recognise the ability for me as a teenager to take exams without fearing for my life, to pick up results without worrying about getting killed, and to be able to wake up in the morning and have breakfast. These are things which Palestinian people have been robbed of, especially Palestinian children who have such huge academic dreams and career aspirations. A lot of them don’t even have their lives now because of Israel’s actions.

Good lad.

Willfully ignoring crimes against humanity again

As American planes are renditioning people to South Sudan via Ireland, Simon McGarr is reminded of the last time the country deliberately looked away from crimes against humanity:

We have been here before, of course. Here’s the 2007 Irish Human Rights Commission’s report on Ireland’s role in the George W Bush era of extraordinary renditions of individuals for the purposes of torture abroad. This was expanded upon by the Open Society’s Justice Initiative’s 2013 report “GLOBALIZING TORTURE: CIA SECRET DETENTION AND EXTRAORDINARY RENDITION“, which determined that Ireland had “facilitated” the CIA rendition and torture project.

Furthermore, the question of planes landing in Shannon and flying on to Israel has also triggered questions as to whether Ireland is being used as a refuelling stop in the delivery of arms to Israel’s government while it prosecutes its military action against the people of Gaza.

The reason that these are still only questions- as yet unanswered- is that the government declines to have officials inspect the planes which land. Indeed, An Garda Síochana seem as determined as they were in the Bush era to place the level of evidence required to trigger an examination of what might be on one of these planes so high that it would be impossible for any member of the public to meet it. The view taken then was that police would only inspect US planes if a member of the public could already prove that there were prisoners (or arms shipments or even undeclared restricted items such as guns) on board.

It’s not surprising that the Irish government would rather look away than confront either the US or Israel. Better to tolerate this than to dire the wrath of either country, would be the thought. Few European governments would choose to do otherwise. How then, could you force them to do so anyway? As McGarr outlines, maybe you need to use VAT law:

A few months ago Lelia Doolan assessed the legal situation regarding the treatment of planes used by the US government stopping at Shannon.

She wrote to the Attorney General to put him on notice that she had concerns that Ireland was not complying with its duties of systemic inspection of planes for cargo under EU VAT law.

A clever tactic which might work but I’m doubtful it will. Perhaps the only way to stop these renditions is to do on a massive scale what people have done with success to prevent immigration arrests in the UK, by surrounding the arresting officers and physically keeping them from taking somebody away.

Deeds not Words

As the poster for 1982’s action epic Megaforce had it. A motto a certain breed of liberal Biden defender and Democrats stan should adopt, as even now they keep putting more value on what’s being said than what’s being done. Throughout the genocide in Gaza I ran into people who took what Biden was saying at face value while refusing to take his actions into account. If Biden said he was working on a peace plan that must be true and that means you can ignore him sending more bombs and weapons to Israel and still vote for Harris. The mantra for anybody who argued against this was that “Trump would be worse” while Gaza was flattened and tens of thousands were murdered. A complete refusal to accept what a Democratic president was perpetrating in reality justified with a hypothetical. Instead of putting pressure on the Democrats to stop the genocide, this type of liberal rather spent their time scolding strangers online for not believing enough in what’s in Biden’s heart.

What frustrated me in this is not even that these people were comfortable having the genocide in Gaza as the price to pay for their own safety, but their refusal to admit that this was what they were doing. Plenty of Democratic voters were both revulsed by their party’s ongoing support for genocide yet still felt compelled to vote for them considering what Trump had in store for America. So many people I talked to in the run up to the election felt helpless and frustrated because of this. But not these people. Even as Trump got Netanyahu to (temporarily) end the genocide, they still put more stock in what he’s saying than in what he’s doing, as with his recent remarks on wanting to remove all Palestinians from Gaza.

This for them is supposed to prove once and for all that Trump is worse than Biden, that they were right to not protest and that those who did were handing Trump the election. Unfortunately, even on their own terms this does not hold water, because Biden too talked about evacuating Gaza:

The plan to empty Gaza of Palestinians—while insisting that it’s a temporary measure for their own good—is an eerie echo of former President Joe Biden’s approach to the region. In the first few days of the war, the Biden administration tried to push Egypt to accept a mass exodus of Palestinians. Bringing up that possibility again, now that the bombs have stopped dropping, is seen by both Arab and Israeli figures as an attempt to restart the war.

Yes, in Biden’s case this was supposed to be temporary and for humanitarian reasons, but that’s the case for Trump too. Trump talked about how Gaza is “literally a demolition site right now, almost everything is demolished and people are dying there” as his justification and Biden’s argument was little different. It makes some sense to evacuate and individual Palestinian families have chosen exile over remaining in a war zone, but does anybody really expected Israel to allow them to return once they left? Even if done for different motives, the end result in both cases would be the same, an emptied Gaza with its population in permanent exile as Israel would never let them return. After all, they haven’t allowed the 1948 refugees to return either.

The World’s Most Moral Army ™

As Yuval Abraham reveals in an article for 972+ Magazine, it turns out Israel deliberately targets ‘militants’ when they’re at home with their family:

Moreover, the Israeli army systematically attacked the targeted individuals while they were in their homes — usually at night while their whole families were present — rather than during the course of military activity. According to the sources, this was because, from what they regarded as an intelligence standpoint, it was easier to locate the individuals in their private houses. Additional automated systems, including one called “Where’s Daddy?” also revealed here for the first time, were used specifically to track the targeted individuals and carry out bombings when they had entered their family’s residences.

Just deliberately murdering entire families because it’s easier:

“We were not interested in killing [Hamas] operatives only when they were in a military building or engaged in a military activity,” A., an intelligence officer, told +972 and Local Call. “On the contrary, the IDF bombed them in homes without hesitation, as a first option. It’s much easier to bomb a family’s home. The system is built to look for them in these situations.”

Oh and this is not an accident, this was explicitly authorised:

In an unprecedented move, according to two of the sources, the army also decided during the first weeks of the war that, for every junior Hamas operative that Lavender marked, it was permissible to kill up to 15 or 20 civilians; in the past, the military did not authorize any “collateral damage” during assassinations of low-ranking militants. The sources added that, in the event that the target was a senior Hamas official with the rank of battalion or brigade commander, the army on several occasions authorized the killing of more than 100 civilians in the assassination of a single commander.

But it’s blood libel to suggest Israel is committing genocide.

“Jewish settlers stole my house. It’s not my fault they’re Jewish.”

We’re always told that we should be careful to distinguish between Israel and “the Jews” and rightly so, that any particular Jewish person or group of Jews cannot be held accountable for the actions of Israel just vbecause they are Jewish. That even as genocide is waged in the name of the Jewish State, we should still make that distinction no matter how much Israel and its propagandists want to erase it, to pretend that Israel is the end and be all of Jewish existence, that all Jews worldwide support it, that opposing it is alwayys antisemitic.

This is good and moral and just to strive to. Plenty of Jewish people and organisations have been outraged and protesting the genocide in Gaza, while plenty of non-Jewish Zionists have enthusiastically supported it. Our governments are not delivering arms and support for the genocide because they’re run by a secret Jewish cabal, they do that for their own purposes. Indulging in antisemitic nonsense about “the Jews” is just letting them off the hook, no different from thinking all Muslims are terrorists.

For Palestinians –the actual victims of Israeli ethnic cleansing and genocide– though the story is different. They have to live with the reality of what is genuinely a Jewish supremacist state, no different from how Black south Africans had to live with the reality of the Apartheid white supremacist state. The violence against them is Jewish violence and yet they are asked to deny this, as Mohammed El-Kurd talks about in this Mondoweiss article from September 2023:

This was no secret. We lived under the rule of the self-proclaimed “Jewish State.” Israeli politicians have exhausted this line, and their international peers nodded along. The army declared itself a Jewish army and marched under what it has called a Jewish flag. Jerusalem city councilmen boasted “tak[ing] house after house” because “the bible says that this country belongs to the Jewish people,” and Knesset members sang similar tunes. These legislators weren’t fringe or far-right: the Israeli nation-state law explicitly enshrines “Jewish settlement” as a “national value … to encourage and promote.”

Still, though this was no secret, we were instructed to treat it as such, sometimes by our parents, sometimes by well-meaning solidarity activists. We were instructed to ignore the Star of David on the Israeli flag, and to distinguish Jews from Zionists with surgical precision. It didn’t matter that their boots were on our necks, and that their bullets and batons bruised us. Our statelessness and homelessness were trivial. What mattered was how we spoke about our keepers, not the conditions they kept us under—blockaded, surrounded by colonies and military outposts—or the fact that they kept us at all.

For the sake of western optics, Palestinians are supposed to deny the reality of their oppressors. Because of the inherent antisemitist history of Europe and America, abny allusion as to why these oppressors feel entitled to their land is verboten and Mohammed El-Kurd is tired of it:

Here is where I stand. There is a Jew who lives–by force—in half of my home in Jerusalem, and he does so by “divine decree.” Many others reside—by force—in Palestinian houses, while their owners linger in refugee camps. It isn’t my fault that they are Jewish. I have zero interest in memorizing or apologizing for centuries-old tropes created by Europeans, or in giving semantics more heft than they warrant, chiefly when millions of us confront real, tangible oppression, living behind cement walls, or under siege, or in exile, and living with woes too expansive to summarize. I’m tired of the impulse to preemptively distance myself from something of which I am not guilty, and particularly tired of the assumption that I’m inherently bigoted. I’m tired of the pearl-clutching pretense that should such animosity exist, its existence would be inexplicable and rootless. Most of all, I’m tired of the false equivalence between semantic violence and systemic violence.

I think he’s right to be tired. It’s impossible to dismantle the Israeli system of Apartheid if we dcontinue to close our eyes to the reality of it, that it is Jewish supremacist, that it justifies its existence through Jewish history. Again, that does not mean that Jews should be blamed for this just because they’re Jewish, but that we should challenge the idea that being Jewish means being in support of the existence of Israel as a Jewish state.