Of course not

Alex asks whether politicians learned anything from the News of the World phone hacking scandal:

Also, did the central government have any communications security at all? Did CESG or MI5 not have anything at all to say about this? Didn’t any of them just change their damn password, or even change their damn number?

Of course not. As a class politicians are the group most clueless about ICT and worst placed to make decisions on anything to do with it and that gets worse the higher up the ranks you get. Most modern politicians these days have never been anything but politicians and in that job you only need a pc as a glorified typewriter, while once you get high enough on the ladder the normal computer scutwork most of us have to deal with day to day can all be fobbed off on interns who’ll print out all the important documents for you. So I doubt they’ve spent any time at all thinking about communications security.

Case in point: several Dutch politicians got hit with a variant of what the News of the World did recently, as investigative reporters from the newsshow Één Vandaag “hacked” their voicemails by trying the standard Vodaphone pincode on them. Quite a few ministers turned out not to have bothered resetting this or even knew that they had to do that. Worse, neither did their IT department. Personally I think having voicemail at all is way too much of a security risk anyway and I’d switch it off altogether if I were in such a responsible function, but than that’s too much of a hassle.

What doesn’t help either is that is how much party political business is interwoven with government responsibilities for modern politicians, meaning that there’s a high risk for cross pollution anway. In an ideal world government ministers would have two or three separate mobiles: one for their job, one for journalists and party workers to reach them on and another for the family, but I suspect most people use the same phone for everything…

Doomed comics are doooomed

Tom Spurgeon is sombre about the prospects of the comics industry:

Sales continue to be down on a year-to-year basis, the month looks good only after a pretty horrid (and realized that it would be so pretty early on) January and February, graphic novels and comic books are both acting a bit rattled, and despite the surge of FF #1 over 100,000, it looks like a new successful-book baseline is under 80K, which isn’t a line that seems like it can hold without potential major structural changes in the industry coming into play. Moreover, as suggested above, the ability Marvel displayed in getting a book to pop over 100K underlines the fact that other kinds of sales success even recently displayed — like Marvel’s success just two to five years ago in getting a variety of its titles into a then stronger-performing top 20, or DC’s capitalizing on a surge of interest in Green Lantern — are at the very least misfiring right now.

My suspicion is that the Direct Market faces some major structural issues — both self-inflicted and pressed upon them by changes in entertainment media generally — that kind of defy the editorial pasting-over and sales finagling by which these things are usually approached. It’s just that now instead of losing out on the opportunity to double the audience, now they’re in danger of seeing that audience shrink to a size where it will be harder and harder to maintain businesses of a certain size and influence.

On the one hand it’s not surprising the American comics market is suffering, in a country still deep in economic recession leaving a lot of people with more important things to spend that $2.99 on they otherwise would’ve bought Green Lantern with. There’s also the ongoing challenge of how to sell comics in the internet age, with comics shops feeling the pressure from internet retailers (Amazon of course) and publishers still struggling to get their comics online in such a way as not to immediately destroy the direct market and still get readers to pay enough for their fake pamphlets to make it worthwhile. More together industries are struggling and failing to come up with an answer to that challenge, so no wonder the comics industry is completely baffled by it. The internet makes information not just want to be free, but gratis — people may grumble but still spend three bucks on a physical pamphlet, but are much less likely to do so for a bucket of bits.

On the other hand, as Tom indicates, much of the problems the American comics industry faces are self inflicted. It has always been dominated by greed, shortsightedness and sheer incompetence, as a result of which it’s now largely limited to serving a slowly dropping number of aging readers through a network of slowly dying comics shops, under the near-monopoly of Diamond and with the biggest, most important two publishers having no clue of how to attract readers other than cannibalise their own audiences through ever more baroque event series. It didn’t have to be that way.

The direct market got its importance because the newsstands through which comics had been traditionally sold were dying off in the seventies and/or stopped selling comics because they didn’t make enough profit per copy or sold enough to make up for it. It took a while for publishers, especially Marvel and DC to notice that there were such things as comics shops and together they made up a market big enough to be interesting, but when they did it saved the industry. No longer you needed massive print runs to distribute to the newsstands, half to three quarters of which would be returned to you a month or so later to break even, you could do smaller print runs and sell every copy to the direct market where they were non-returnable. Though there was some worry about cutting comics off from finding new readers — who’d go to a comics shop after all if they don’t already read comics — the DM worked well for about a decade or so. The 1987 black and white bust, when too many publishers tried to cash in on the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles success by bringing out their own crappy variantions was an early warning sign that the collecting side of the DM might cause trouble, but it wasn’t until 1992-1996 that the comics industry really attempted to commit suicide.

What else would you call an attempt of every concievable publisher save Fantagraphics to start their own superhero universe of gimmicked overprinted first issues drawn by Liefeld, McFarlane or Jim Lee clones all to chase the success of X-Men #1, an issue that sold eight million copies for an audience that usually consisted of about 300,000 readers. And everybody know this wasn’t going to end well, but every fscker still went for the quick buck, the Big Two worse than everybody else, trying to squeeze everybody else out. When the crash came, in 1993-1994 dozens of publishers folded, hundreds of shops went bust and thousands of readers and collectors went to look for the next big thing: Pogs. But then Marvel thought up a way to make things even worse: buy the third biggest distributor of comics to the direct market and go exclusive, then be as incompentent as possible in being a distributor while all the other big publishers went for their own exclusivity deals with Diamond or Capital, leading to the collapse of the latter. Marvel almost destroyed itself as well and came back crawling to Diamond and the endresult was a much smaller comics market now serviced by only one distributor with little inclination to innovate or improve. Very cozy it is for the bigger publishers as well.

But it has left comics as a whole vulnerable. They can no longer be found on newsstands, while comics shops have become scarce as well and publishers cater to established fans, not new readers. And just when they’ve finally made the jump to the bookstores and are taken seriously there, that industry has started to collapse as well, thanks to Amazon. Comics as an artform will survive, but how the industry will survive is anybody’s guess.

Now many of the challenges faced by American comics were similar to those that the European comics industry had to deal with, yet it seems to have dealt much better with them. I would love to see somebody with some real knowledge of both compare their histories to see where each went wrong and right.

The dirty little secret of publishing

Nick Mamatas has it:

Finally, I saw some question about whether or not the original withdrawing author will be “blackballed” for being a troublemaker. The best answer to this is HAHAHAHAHAHA! The sad fact that nobody ever believes is this: there’s not a lot of competition out there. There really isn’t. It’s hard to find people who can write well, and that goes double for short stories or convincing young adult material. The field may seem competitive because of all the semi-literate baboons out there blogging about their rejections slips, but they don’t count. Remember the try-out weeks on American Idol—it’s like that. Tens of thousands try, maybe a couple hundred are good enough to make it to Hollywood Week, and in publishing there’s no need to find a single winner. Verday, whom Bookscan tells me sells fairly well, ain’t going nowhere. Certainly no book publisher cares about the placement of a story in someone else’s anthology, or any ensuing controversy. Verday almost certainly made back her lost $250 and more in terms of goodwill and linking and solidarity purchases of her books. So good for her, bad for the editor, and bad for the publisher for being snotty and defensive in its public statement.

Context available at his original post.

Evan Dorkin is god

sketch of the Demon Etrigan by Evan Dorkin

Just a sketch Evan Dorkin did out of boredom of Etrigan the Demon, one of Jack Kirby’s seventies creations. I just love this sketch to bits; so adorable, so recognisably still a Kirby creation yet also very Dorkinesque. He has been doing other sketches of classic Marvel heroes and villains on his Livejournal before and everytime I wonder why Marvel hasn’t gotten him to do some sort of project –graphic novel, miniseries, oneshot, anything– with whatever sixties Marvel characters he would want to use. Because I would pay quite a few bright, shiny pennies for something like that.