George Tuska

Just before the weekend George Tuska died. Tuska was one of those comic book artists (like Don Heck, Herb Trimbe, Vinnie Colleta, even Gene Colan at times) who are only known to several generations of comic book readers as disappointing fill-in artists, ill-served as they were by having to survive in an industry where comics books were made like saugages, the artists as interchangable as workers on an assembly line — who cared if it was good, as long as it was fast. So I only knew Tuska from his (increasingly rare) fill-in work in the eighties and seventies, which wasn’t that good but still offered glimpses of his real capabilities.

Tuska started in comics back in the early forties, at a time when the highest aspiration a cartoonist could have was to have his own newspaper strip. He never managed that, but he did have long stints on two classics, Buck Rogers and Scorchy Smith. He also did a lot of work for the various comics sweatshops that were then operating, including for Will Eisner. During the sixties he was one of Marvel’s second bananas (as compared to legends like Ditko and Kirby, his longest work being on Iron Man, on which he had a ten year run from ’68 to ’78. He also worked on various Bronze Age titles like Ghostrider, and others. He never was a big star or fan favourite, but a solid, dependable artist. Tom Spurgeon has a nice appreciation up of Tuska’s career and art, explaining his appeal:

It’s unclear if perhaps Tuska suffered a bit in terms of overall ease making the transition from strips back into comic books, and whether he felt entirely comfortable working under the basic model established by Jack Kirby: his layouts were certainly more imaginative than the standard at the time, and the way in which characters like Luke Cage held a lot of their strength in their shoulders and punched from their legs up through their torsos betrayed his knowledge of strength and fitness. His signature flourish may have been characters in arrested motion, coiled in preparation for violence like so many pulp heroes of an earlier generation, legs splayed in the form of a near-base ready for what might come next. While perhaps slightly diminished in otherworldly power that many comics artists milked from the contrast of stillness and exaggerated movement, Tuska’s heroes almost certainly suffered fewer muscle pulls.



George Tuska drawing Iron Man v Kang

That’s what I remember as well of Tuska, the way his characters stood and moved — you could always tell when Tuska did the art just by that, just like you could with Jack Kirby or Gil Kane. The art above is a good example. Both figures are slightly off centre, Iron Man leaning forward, with Kang leaning backward, one arm outstretched, the other held back for immediate action, both figures balanced on their feet, ready to move if necessary. Though static, there’s a feeling of suppressed movement there, even with the empty background. As Tom Spurgeon says, it shows a knowledge of how real people move, looks far more realistic than a similar Kirby pose, more raw than how Gil Kane would show this scene. That’s what made Tuska’s art always recognisable, no matter how hurried it was.

Comment of the Weekend: growing up multiracial

One multiracial child responds to that Louisiana judge’s foolishness about not wanting to perform mixed marriages because it’s so hard on the children not being normal:

White people are funny like that; they think they are the normal, and everyone else is “multicultural” and “ethnic” and strange; they think they are the only way to be. But we outnumber you, you know. Right now, we outnumber you in volume of numbers – I’m an Indian woman, one in twelve of living humans is Indian and female, and one in six is brown (and stands up straight, and is strong, intelligent and beautiful, despite not being pale like you). Right now, we outnumber you; mathematically, we are the normal, and it’s only accidents of history that make you so proud of being white. (Even if we weren’t, we sing, dance and tan better than you. Deal.)

As you can see from the handsome picture on the left hand side of your screen, I’m somebody who has grown up seeing people who look like me on television, in the movies, in magazines and so on all the time, whose race, skin colour and gender were defined as normal by the media I grew up with. Worse, I grew up in the most whitebread part of the most whitebread province in the Netherlands, where a full three quarters of the average school class would be blonde haired, blue aryans and the rest would have dark hair. And although the reality of life even there has become much more …colourful… the media have lagged behind. White men are still the norm, anybody else the exception. it’s no wonder that we think we are normal, as people like m grew up with the priviledge of seeing our natural assumption of being the norm affirmed all around us.

But even the flawed reflection in the media of our multicultural societies has made that illusion less and less easy to maintain. The US never was a purely “white” country, the UK and Holland haven’t been one for a long time, but for a lot of people, like that idiot in Louisiana, this is a hard truth to swallow. Especially when the world turned scary again in the wake of the September 11 attacks, the War on Iraq and locally, the murders of Pim Fortuyn and Theo van Gogh. This fear and discomfort forms what I think is the reason for Geert Wilders’ popularity, as well as a more widespread change of attitude in the Netherlands.



The Netherlands has long had a reputation for being a tolerant nation, but this tolerance has quickly disappeared in the past decade. It’s not just Islamophobia, though that’s a large part of it, but it’s a general shift in attitude towards all foreigners. There’s much less willingness to accomodate strangers, less pride in being able to speak to them in their own language and a more explicit demand that they learn our language if they come over here — and that goes for Moroccan as well as English immigrants.

The governmental commercial shown above is a good example of this new attitude. It shows several “obviously” foreign people (i.e., not-white) trying to ask questions in their own languages of an authority figure only to be stared at uncomprendingly before the patronising voiceover starts talking about how much easier it is to learn Dutch. The focus is on the duty of these people to adapt, not on the government’s role in helping them adapt.

This change in attitude is widespread, not limited to Wilders voters, — I’ve heard plenty of supposedly liberal people saying that of course everybody who lives here should learn Dutch and that the government shouldn’t waste money offering information in any other language. I’m not sure what can be done to change this attitude again, but it would help if the government didn’t encourage it in its propaganda.

Your Happening World (5)

A Pillow Book for Cats — Ursula Le Guin revealing a talent as cartoonist.

Fisking McArdle — almost as perverse an activity as sounds like and she won’t learn a thing anyway, because that’s not why she writes her crap, as this guy realises all too well, but he can’t help himself.

Over at Livejournal, Ross TenEyck had to do jury duty and described the experience for those of us living in a post-Napoleonic law system.

Continuing the legal theme, this judgement (pdf) in which queen bee of the Birthers Orly Taitz is slapped down for wasting the court’s time.

Meanwhile in Holland, the news that Brown is sending more troops to Afghanistan, but only if the Afghan government does x and the NATO allies do y and all the planets are aligned, has given fresh ammo to the people who’d like to extend the Dutch mission once again. We were promised back in 2001/02 that it would be one deployment with no extension, then we got an extension but with the promise that it would end in 2010, no matter what happened and now we have to extend this once again, because we can’t leave our allies behind. Must think we’re born yesterday.

You got to be fucking kidding me

BBC to vet BNP Question Time audience for anti-fascists but not fascists? Seem so:

Audience members for the Question Time edition featuring BNP chief Nick Griffin are being rigorously’ vetted by BBC producers to weed out likely anti-fascist demonstrators, it was confirmed today.

BBC bosses fear protesters could disrupt the recording of the programme, due to take place at the Wood Lane studios on 22 October.

As well as filling out the normal detailed questionnaire, applicants to become audience members will also be checked for membership or involvement in organisations such as United Against Facism. Many are likely to be questioned personally and be asked to prove their identities on the door.

United Against Facism, which is planning a mass blockade of the BBC studios on the day, has also urged its supporters to apply to join the audience, putting a link on its website to the audience application form.

The Corporation has confirmed that it is working closely with the Metropolitan Police and Hammersmith and Fulham council to keep a lid on the protests.

The council is concerned at the potential for disruption to local people and has asked the BBC to pay for extra policing, which the Corporation has rejected.

Heaven knows we can’t have any disturbances when the fash Nick Griffin is spouting his filth. Nice to see the Met getting involved as well; they know how to deal with peaceful protests, as proven earlier this year.

Bank fail

The biggest news story in the Netherlands today is the collapse of the DSB bank, the government closing it down yesterday after a renewed bank run when rescue plans failed over the weekend. The bank had seemed to weather the economical crisis remarkably well, but had gotten into trouble for the way its supposedly cheap loans and mortgages turned out to be not so cheap after the fact, as well as how it sold all sorts of unnecessary policies on top of its mortgages. Thousands of customers were sold much too expensive mortgages and insurance and things came to a head when the self-proclaimed spokesperson for these people called for a bank run on DSB, supposedly because a bankruptcy would make it easier to renegotiate these loans. Absurd, but it worked.

Or at least, worked so far in that DSB is now almost bankrupt. Whether or not anybody will get their money back is doubtful and anybody with a dodgy, too expensive mortgage will still be stuck with it no matter what. Debts are assets after all, somebody will buy them up, whether or not DSB will sink.

At the joint press conference yesterday the finance minister Wouter Bos explained why DSB was allowed to fail where Fortis, ABN Amro or ING weren’t. Apparantly these were completely healty banks overcome by an unforeseen economic crisis, while DSB caused its own problems. A strange explanation, when Fortis had to be rescued from its own greed in attempting to takeover ABN and ING had been selling –and worse buying– dodgy mortgages in America which turned out to be not so valuable as they had thought. They had dug their own graves as much as DSB, but only the latter was allowed to lie down in it.

A classic case of the centre vs the provinces, I fear. Dirk Schieringa, the DSB’s owner/creator and sugardaddy to current Dutch football champions AZ, is an archetypical provincial selfmade man, who made his money in the provinces and also spends it there, without connections to the established money and power centres. Brass, somewhat dodgy, an upstart, so easy to throw to the sharks.