I’ll shown mine if you show yours


gelijk oversteken banner

From January 1st 2005, we’re back to the German occupation here, as everybody 14 years or older is obliged to carry an ausweis, with the police allowed to ask for them everytime they feel like. (Alright, officially they can only do so if they need to “keep the public order”, but we all know that that can be anything.) This is not something I am planning to adhere to and I’m fortunately not the only one. However, if asked for papers and you cannot or will not show them it’ll cost ya fifty euros (with which we neatly discover the real reason for this new law: bugger security, it’s all about the do-re-mi.)

Fortunately, as Hiram of Ipse Dixit (in Dutch) discovered, us peons are at least allowed to asks police agents for their papers as well. So Hiram thought of a plan: “I’ll show you mine if you show me yours“. Every time we are asked for our papers, we should ask the agent as well. This way, it’ll cost all those jumped up little h–lers twice as much time, they’ll discover how obnoxious this law is first hand and those few who would abuse the new law for their own ends can be registrered…

No, I’m not sure the practise will match the theory, but it is worth a try…

More on Blunkett’s resignation

Recently started blogging again Take it as Red has a good encapsulation of why Blunkett was so horrible and what did him in:

Apparently Tony, the expert on integrity and honesty – where are those WMD, Mr Blair?- thinks Blunkett “…is a force for good”. No, no and again no. He’s a selfish, selfish man whose first loyalty is to himself and no-one else. Everything he has done has been about how he himself feels; he has shown no consideration towards his duty to the country, let alone any human concern for his ex- mistress or putative child or even his existing family, and his main concern all along has been that he escape the consequences of his actions. Why else would he appear on BBC2’s Newsnight last night, looking for the sympathy vote and telling the world “It was all worth it for that little lad”? He does not even know the child is his, except by some magical sixth sense, and even if it were he is merely the biological parent. How ironic if the DNA test proves the child is the husband’s.

The BBC has been enjoying this a lot, and I don’t blame them one bit. As I said in an earlier post, it’s the Establishment that will do for New Labour, and now the Establishment has the smell of blood in its collective nostrils. The letters and emails that have come to light would never have done so without the co-operation of the civil service; the story wouldn’t have had legs if Blunkett, in his hubris, hadn’t continued to bombard the BBC with constant protestations of his honesty; in doing so he gave the BBC and Civil Service just the ammunition they needed.

Indeed.

Ding-dong the witch is dead!

Blunkett finally resigned.

Too bad it wasn’t for his blatant disregard for the rule of law and civil rights, but at least we know now that smary hypocritical Labour weasels can be brought down just as well as their Tory counterparts could in the eighties and nineties.

David Blunkett looking like a dickhead

For those who don’t know why Blunkett resigned, it all started when his affair with a married woman was revealed; soon after it turned out that he may have …helped his lover, Kimberly Quinn (publisher of the rightwing Spectator) in various ways, including fast tracking visa applications for her nanny. It then turned out she was pregnant with her second child, which may or may not be Blunkett’s,which did not stop him from starting a lawsuit against Mrs Quinn to obtain access rights to her two year old son, which he apparantely believes is his and with whom he has been parading as his own son when he went on holidays with Mrs Quinn…

Apart from the legalities of it all, the hypocrisy of it all is quite astounding. The sheer cheek of somebody who sees no bone in sueing his pregnant ex-lover, a married woman over visiting rights to her son which may or not be fathered by him, lecturing others on morals. Incredible.

It certainly makes me Proud of Britain to see him gone.
Now for the rest of the cabinet…

Now the question is who will be the new Home Secretary: Peter “incompetent” Hain perhaps or Alan “who he?” Milburn. The other question is what will happen to Blunkett’s pet projects, like the national ID card he wanted to introduce.

Michael Moore and the Democratic Party

Michael Moore is the creator of the most succesful documentary ever released in the US, a movie that grossed more on its opening weekend than any other documentary did during its entire theatrical run and which did so while being run in less than 900 theatres.

This documentary, Fahrenheit 9/11 was the first documentary to gross over 100 million dollars, was the first to sell more than 2 million copies of the DVD on the first day of release.

More importantly, it was the first mass media examination of many of the important issues surrounding
the war in Iraq.

The man himself is one of the few unwavering left wing voices in the US mass media, somebody who has never sold out to the Republicans, never attempted to be a Republican-lite.

Why then should the Democratic Party disassociate itself from him?

The answers can be found easily when you read Peter Beinart’s nasty little piece of scaremongering: he longs for the good old days of commie-bashing:

On January 4, 1947, 130 men and women met at Washington’s Willard Hotel to save American liberalism. A few months earlier, in articles in The New Republic and elsewhere, the columnists Joseph and Stewart Alsop had warned that “the liberal movement is now engaged in sowing the seeds of its own destruction.” Liberals, they argued, “consistently avoided the great political reality of the present: the Soviet challenge to the West.” Unless that changed, “In the spasm of terror which will seize this country … it is the right–the very extreme right–which is most likely to gain victory.”

[…]

But, over the next two years, in bitter political combat across the institutions of American liberalism,
anti-communism gained strength. With the ADA’s help, Truman crushed Wallace’s third-party challenge en route to reelection. The formerly leftist Congress of Industrial Organizations (CIO) expelled its communist affiliates and The New Republic broke with Wallace, its former editor. The American Civil Liberties Union (aclu) denounced communism, as did the naacp. By 1949, three years after Winston Churchill warned that an “iron curtain” had descended across Europe, Schlesinger could write in The Vital Center: “Mid-twentieth century liberalism, I believe, has thus been fundamentally reshaped … by the exposure of the Soviet Union, and by the deepening of our knowledge of man. The consequence of this historical re-education has been an unconditional rejection of totalitarianism.”

A sort of noxious anti-communism then, updated for the 21st century. Peter Beinart is one of those though, realistic no-nonsense foreign hawks at the New Republic whose main achievement seems to be helping Bush confuse the “war against terrorism” with invading Afghanistan and Iraq, with Michael Moore and MoveOn.org substitute for the communists as the enemies of liberalism ™:

When liberals talk about America’s new era, the discussion is largely negative–against the Iraq war, against restrictions on civil liberties, against America’s worsening reputation in the world. In sharp contrast to the first years of the cold war, post-September 11 liberalism has produced leaders and institutions–most notably Michael Moore and MoveOn–that do not put the struggle against America’s
new totalitarian foe at the center of their hopes for a better world. As a result, the Democratic Party
boasts a fairly hawkish foreign policy establishment and a cadre of politicians and strategists eager to
look tough. But, below this small elite sits a Wallacite grassroots that views America’s new struggle as
a distraction, if not a mirage. Two elections, and two defeats, into the September 11 era, American
liberalism still has not had its meeting at the Willard Hotel. And the hour is getting late.

It is disgusting to see somebody who has been so wrong on so many occasions in the past four years to be accusing one of the few effective American leftwing people of well, being a traitor. This is why the Democratic Party is in trouble, because of this elitist cliche of idiots, shut away safely inside the
Beltway or in the Ivy Leagues, who have no clue about the real world and who don’t really care about what is happening there, as long as their cozy lives are not disturbed. It’s sickening.